STX E36 question

General discussions about Solo

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

Brian Peters
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am

Re: STX E36 question

Post by Brian Peters »

Eric Clements wrote:
Morgan Trotter wrote: Im finding that the coupe has a more ridgid chasis as well.
I was told the added B pillar made the sedan stiffer...
I'm with Eric. I don't have E36 numbers, but these E46 numbers (via Google) are consistent with what I recall seeing from a factory publication:

BMW E46 Sedan (w/o folding seats) 18,000 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Sedan (w/folding seats) 13,000 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Wagon (w/folding seats) 14,000 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Coupe (w/folding seats) 12,500 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Convertible 10,500 Nm/deg

Note the huge spread. FWIW, Doug's car does not have folding seats. :)
User avatar
Marshall Grice
Former CSCC Overall Champion
Posts: 1617
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 11

Re: STX E36 question

Post by Marshall Grice »

Brian Peters wrote:
Eric Clements wrote:
Morgan Trotter wrote: Im finding that the coupe has a more ridgid chasis as well.
I was told the added B pillar made the sedan stiffer...
I'm with Eric. I don't have E36 numbers, but these E46 numbers (via Google) are consistent with what I recall seeing from a factory publication:

BMW E46 Sedan (w/o folding seats) 18,000 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Sedan (w/folding seats) 13,000 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Wagon (w/folding seats) 14,000 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Coupe (w/folding seats) 12,500 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Convertible 10,500 Nm/deg

Note the huge spread. FWIW, Doug's car does not have folding seats. :)
seems like the folding seats has the largest effect on the chassis stiffness, not the B-pillar. In the list quoted, the e46 sedan(w/folding seats) and e46 coupe are essentially the same stiffness.

from a structural perspective the shape of the B-pillar is not an efficient load path for increasing torsional stiffness.
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Re: STX E36 question

Post by Craig Naylor »

Marshall Grice wrote:
Brian Peters wrote:
Eric Clements wrote: I was told the added B pillar made the sedan stiffer...
I'm with Eric. I don't have E36 numbers, but these E46 numbers (via Google) are consistent with what I recall seeing from a factory publication:

BMW E46 Sedan (w/o folding seats) 18,000 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Sedan (w/folding seats) 13,000 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Wagon (w/folding seats) 14,000 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Coupe (w/folding seats) 12,500 Nm/deg
BMW E46 Convertible 10,500 Nm/deg

Note the huge spread. FWIW, Doug's car does not have folding seats. :)
seems like the folding seats has the largest effect on the chassis stiffness, not the B-pillar. In the list quoted, the e46 sedan(w/folding seats) and e46 coupe are essentially the same stiffness.

from a structural perspective the shape of the B-pillar is not an efficient load path for increasing torsional stiffness.
Based upon that, you ought to get the wagon. Get your folding seats, and more structural stiffness. Plus it might be closer to a 50/50 weight distribution than any of the others.
User avatar
Richard Jung
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 71
Location: Irvine, CA
Contact:

Re: STX E36 question

Post by Richard Jung »

We may have an E46 wagon for sale sometime in the future. ;)
Ira Cruz
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: No$
Car#: 789

Re: STX E36 question

Post by Ira Cruz »

Richard Jung wrote:We may have an E46 wagon for sale sometime in the future. ;)
5 speed manual?
User avatar
Richard Jung
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 71
Location: Irvine, CA
Contact:

Re: STX E36 question

Post by Richard Jung »

Ira Cruz wrote:
Richard Jung wrote:We may have an E46 wagon for sale sometime in the future. ;)
5 speed manual?
Steptronic, sport suspension, manual sport seats in faux black leather, no sunroof, custom ordered. I never could understand why the E46 325it wagon handled better than the 330ci coupe or the E46 M3. I thought maybe it had a different steering rack or slightly lighter motor? Brian's stiffness #s probably has more to do with it. Also while it has very low ride ht., the wagon has stiffer rear springs in anticipation of heavier cargo wt.
User avatar
Kurt Rahn
Posts: 3923
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 88
Location: Pasadena

Re: STX E36 question

Post by Kurt Rahn »

Richard Jung wrote:
Ira Cruz wrote:5 speed manual?
Steptronic
Is that Bimmese for "automatic?" }:)
==============
Oversteer is better than understeer because you don't see the tree you're hitting.
User avatar
Richard Jung
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 71
Location: Irvine, CA
Contact:

Re: STX E36 question

Post by Richard Jung »

Kurt Rahn wrote:
Richard Jung wrote:
Ira Cruz wrote:5 speed manual?
Steptronic
Is that Bimmese for "automatic?" }:)
Yep, with sequential manual control.
Post Reply