STS Rule question and answer!

General discussions about Solo

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

Post Reply
User avatar
Marc Leininger
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: No$
Car#: 411
Location: Altadena, looking to move NOW!

STS Rule question and answer!

Post by Marc Leininger »

Hello everyone,

This last race on 2-9-14 was much fun right?! It was for me but I was approached by someone and we struck up a interesting conversation about class legality and he came to the conclusion that my car was indeed illegal for STS. This was indeed troubling news because as soon as my suspension is installed and I'm able to get a proper alignment and decent tires I want to make a run at a regional championship.

The part in question that I was told to be illegal was my rear spoiler and soon to be installed R-package front dam and rear skirt. You see my car is not an R-pack... it is sadly quite the opposite. its what is know as a p for power steering (or pathetic).
So I read the rule book again because the part that stated that it would be LEGAL to install accessory parts on my car was to be in fact removed for 2014! Damn I thought. But thankfully my efforts of reading the somewhat confusing rules were not in vane. I found were the rules state in 14.2.F
F. Addition of spoilers, splitters, rear wings, bumper covers, valances, side skirts, and non-functional sccops/vents is allowed provided that either:
1. It is a production part which is standard or optional equipment of
a US model of the vehicle. (“Model” is defi ned in Section 12.3.)
2. It is listed in the vehicle manufacturer’s US accessory catalog
for that vehicle for normal highway use. This does not allow for
parts sold through a manufacturer’s performance catalog (e.g.,
Ford Racing, HPD, Mazdaspeed, Mopar Performance, Mugen,
NISMO, SPT, TRD, etc).
Parts must be installed as directed by the manufacturer. Exact replicas,including weight, from alternate sources are also permitted.
So now things got simple. All I had to do was locate a 18 year old small sales brochures that was made of the best paper that technology was capable of producing and be assured that it would state that there was such an accessory available. NO PROBLEM!!! :lol:

WELL LOOKEY WHAT I FOUND!!!
Image FROM THE 1996 SALES BROCHURE
Image FROM THE MAZDA ACCESSORY LEAFLET (USING FOR DESCRIPTION IMAGE DEFINITION).

Well I hope that's the last of that yeah!?

If anyone sees something I'm missing PLEASE let me know. I'm all ears. Oh and don't worry I know my car never came with the brace for the rear suspension so I will not be putting that on. :thumbup:
Last edited by Marc Leininger on Fri Feb 14, 2014 5:50 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Pete Loney
Posts: 1083
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 777
Location: Torrance

Re: STS Rule question and answer!

Post by Pete Loney »

Nice work Mark, thanks for taking the time to find those brochures.
2021 Season: 777 ES | 1999 Miata, 10th Anniversary #3987/7500
MIATAROADSTER.COM
Jonathan Lugod
King of Fastrack!
Posts: 966
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 194
Location: Oceanside

Re: STS Rule question and answer!

Post by Jonathan Lugod »

SRSBZNS
http://www.osgiken.net
4 BSP- 2019 Mazda ND Miata - 2001 SSM Honda S2000
OS Giken / Bride / ShaftWorks USA
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Re: STS Rule question and answer!

Post by Craig Naylor »

You are correct, the R package Front Air dam, rear skirt, and spoiler are legal in STS. Whats is not legal in STS is a true "R package" as it would include the Torson SD, which is illegal in STS.

More to the point, Pete's car has been to Nationals with the Air dam and skirt installed and was not protested. Most of the Miatas present had them installed. I personally have the spoiler on my car, and the one I drove at Nationals did too.

RE: Power steering... so do I w/ AC still installed too. :thumbup:
User avatar
Sebastian Rios
King of Fastrack!
Posts: 1656
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 397
Location: Out to lunch

Re: STS Rule question and answer!

Post by Sebastian Rios »

Sorry to make you go through all that hassle Marc. I kind of figured that with all the possible flavors of Miata you would be able to keep that stuff.
Still a good excercise in SCCA Solo rules interpretation.

Craig, although Pete's car has been to Nats and not been protested, the rules have changed for this year (2014).
User avatar
Steve Ekstrand
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 7482
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 15
Location: This space left intentionally blank
Contact:

Re: STS Rule question and answer!

Post by Steve Ekstrand »

I've been threatened with protest on items that most cars in previous years had. So don't assume even without a rules change that a car is safe just because it survived nationals before.
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
User avatar
Steve Lepper
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: TCC
Car#: 355
Location: Orange, CA
Contact:

Re: STS Rule question and answer!

Post by Steve Lepper »

Steve, that's just because you're you. :lol:

Good work! I have all those brochures from when I bought my '97 new, so had I known I could have saved you a lot of trouble.

An R-package car would be legal... you just have to take the Torsen diff out and install a factory open unit (don't get me started....) Just like if you had a 1.6 car you could install a factory viscous unit if your car didn't have one.
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Re: STS Rule question and answer!

Post by Craig Naylor »

Seb, your correct the rules did change slightly this year. This year their inclusion would have been legal as they were in the past based on the revised wording in section:
F. Addition of spoilers, splitters, rear wings, bumper covers, valances,
side skirts, and non-functional sccops/vents is allowed provided that
either:
1. It is a production part which is standard or optional equipment of
a US model of the vehicle.
The parts were standard on the R package.

OR (the new section)
2. It is listed in the vehicle manufacturer’s US accessory catalog for that vehicle for normal highway use.
For which Mark posted his research.

Would that mean you could run double sets, as their legal under two different sections of the rule? :lol:
Post Reply