Rule Clarification

General discussions about Solo

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

Post Reply
Webster Jessup
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:57 pm
Club: CASOC
Car#: 122
Location: SoCal

Rule Clarification

Post by Webster Jessup »

Stock Class
13.5 SHOCK ABSORBERS
A.2. Suspension geometry and alignment capability, not including
ride height
, may not be altered by the substitution of alternate
shock absorbers. This includes the position of the steering
arm attachment point in the case of struts with integrated
steering arms.
A.3. Adjustable spring perches are allowed, but the spring loadbearing
surface must be in the same location relative to the
shock mounting points as on the standard part.
Shims may
be used to achieve compliance.
So, 13.5.A.2 states that ride height may be change as it is not included in the restriction.

But, 13.5.A.3 states that adjustable spring perches are allowed, but the the spring load bearing surface must be the same height relative to where the shock mounts, ie so that the car remains the stock height and is not lowered.

So, I assume that adjustable spring perches are allowed just so that a slew of aftermarket shocks aren't excluded, provided the competitor adjust the perch to the stock height.
User avatar
Robert Puertas
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 44

Re: Rule Clarification

Post by Robert Puertas »

correct
Aaron Goldsmith
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 4:22 pm
Club: CASOC
Car#: 32
Location: HB, CA

Re: Rule Clarification

Post by Aaron Goldsmith »

exactly
User avatar
Steve Ekstrand
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 7482
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 15
Location: This space left intentionally blank
Contact:

Re: Rule Clarification

Post by Steve Ekstrand »

I'm guessing also the rules are written as they are to avoid ride height issues brought about by gas pressures or dynamic rebound clamping.
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
Post Reply