Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Moderators: Mike Simanyi, Christine Grice, Rick Brown
- Craig Naylor
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
- Club: SCNAX
- Car#: 80
- Location: Long Beach
Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Question... the #1 seed should be the person with the best win over class while the 32nd seed should be the last one who got in by the hair on their teeth, correct?
Ladies classes must have been skimpy. Only 4 made it into the challenge.
Ladies classes must have been skimpy. Only 4 made it into the challenge.
- Jayson Woodruff
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: PSCC
- Car#: 51
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
That's how I understand it, but you run out of winners well before you get to #32 and start taking close non-winners. Should be spelled out in the Sup Regs though. With that 'seeding' the high seeds (1,2,3) should be facing non-class winners, who in theory are indexed beyond their ability.
Jay W
Jay W
Craig Naylor wrote:Question... the #1 seed should be the person with the best win over class while the 32nd seed should be the last one who got in by the hair on their teeth, correct?
- Craig Naylor
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
- Club: SCNAX
- Car#: 80
- Location: Long Beach
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
That's what I though, and then surmised after looking at the rules. But... then I was confused based upon the results posted on SCCA.com for the event.
The reason I was asking was based upon the results in STS. The class winner (Andrew Hahn) was ranked 31st, while the 2nd place (David Whitener) was ranked #6, for the Super Challenge, and I found that odd.
So either the results for the Super Challenge are wrong, or the results for the class are wrong.
The reason I was asking was based upon the results in STS. The class winner (Andrew Hahn) was ranked 31st, while the 2nd place (David Whitener) was ranked #6, for the Super Challenge, and I found that odd.
So either the results for the Super Challenge are wrong, or the results for the class are wrong.
- Jayson Woodruff
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: PSCC
- Car#: 51
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
I think the numbers for the bracket are upside down, but it's in the right order. Try from top to bottom:
1
32
16
17
8
25
9
24
4
29
13
20
5
28
12
21
2
31
15
18
7
26
10
23
3
30
14
19
6
27
11
22
Seems to make more sence.
Jay W
1
32
16
17
8
25
9
24
4
29
13
20
5
28
12
21
2
31
15
18
7
26
10
23
3
30
14
19
6
27
11
22
Seems to make more sence.
Jay W
Craig Naylor wrote:That's what I though, and then surmised after looking at the rules. But... then I was confused based upon the results posted on SCCA.com for the event.
The reason I was asking was based upon the results in STS. The class winner (Andrew Hahn) was ranked 31st, while the 2nd place (David Whitener) was ranked #6, for the Super Challenge, and I found that odd.
So either the results for the Super Challenge are wrong, or the results for the class are wrong.
- Christine Grice
- King of Fastrack!
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: CASOC
- Car#: 17
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
This matches what the Nationals Staff was talking about at El Toro. They felt that it was actually a detriment to the top qualifier to run last in the first round. If the top qualifier makes it to the final round, it gives the first run off pairing more time to cool down.Jayson Woodruff wrote:I think the numbers for the bracket are upside down, but it's in the right order. Try from top to bottom:
...
Seems to make more sence.
Jay W
~Christine Grice
2006 Mitsubishi Evolution, Berry Family Racing/Hoosier/ChaseCam
2006 Mitsubishi Evolution, Berry Family Racing/Hoosier/ChaseCam
- Craig Naylor
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
- Club: SCNAX
- Car#: 80
- Location: Long Beach
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
- Rick Brown
- Current Solo Director
- Posts: 5117
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
- Club: PSCC
- Car#: 240
- Location: Lake Elsinore, CA
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Why don't you just email Howard?
Since light is faster than sound...many people look bright until they speak...
- KJ Christopher
- Executive Board Member
- Posts: 2818
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
- Club: No$
- Car#: 11
- Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Are Andrew and David still driving the same car?Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
kj
Use the email link. I don't read nor get notified of PMs.
Former No$ Club Rep | Former SCCA Area 11 Director |Former CSCC Solo Chair
Caged Z Motorsports - automotive consultation
The ACME Special Now with Super Speed Vitamins
Use the email link. I don't read nor get notified of PMs.
Former No$ Club Rep | Former SCCA Area 11 Director |Former CSCC Solo Chair
Caged Z Motorsports - automotive consultation
The ACME Special Now with Super Speed Vitamins
- Craig Naylor
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
- Club: SCNAX
- Car#: 80
- Location: Long Beach
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
What kind of workbench racing would that be?Rick Brown wrote:Why don't you just email Howard?
- Craig Naylor
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
- Club: SCNAX
- Car#: 80
- Location: Long Beach
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
So many ways that could be answered.KJ Christopher wrote:Are Andrew and David still driving the same car?Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Yes - They co drove
Maybe - The photo's look like the same car, but I guess a new "car" with the same paint job could have replaced the prior one.
Not for long - If Andrew keeps beating David the car owner. }:)
- Pete Loney
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: SCNAX
- Car#: 777
- Location: Torrance
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Partially a new Car, they were running Rivals!Craig Naylor wrote:So many ways that could be answered.KJ Christopher wrote:Are Andrew and David still driving the same car?Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Yes - They co drove
Maybe - The photo's look like the same car, but I guess a new "car" with the same paint job could have replaced the prior one.
Not for long - If Andrew keeps beating David the car owner. }:)
2021 Season: 777 ES | 1999 Miata, 10th Anniversary #3987/7500
MIATAROADSTER.COM
MIATAROADSTER.COM
- Jayson Woodruff
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: PSCC
- Car#: 51
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
I see David in 17th seed under 'my' schedule.Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Jay W