Minerel Wells Pro Solo

For coordinating upcoming events and remembering past ones.

Moderators: Mike Simanyi, Christine Grice, Rick Brown

Post Reply
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Craig Naylor »

Question... the #1 seed should be the person with the best win over class while the 32nd seed should be the last one who got in by the hair on their teeth, correct?

Ladies classes must have been skimpy. Only 4 made it into the challenge.
User avatar
Jayson Woodruff
Posts: 1754
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 51

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Jayson Woodruff »

That's how I understand it, but you run out of winners well before you get to #32 and start taking close non-winners. Should be spelled out in the Sup Regs though. With that 'seeding' the high seeds (1,2,3) should be facing non-class winners, who in theory are indexed beyond their ability.

Jay W
Craig Naylor wrote:Question... the #1 seed should be the person with the best win over class while the 32nd seed should be the last one who got in by the hair on their teeth, correct?
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Craig Naylor »

That's what I though, and then surmised after looking at the rules. But... then I was confused based upon the results posted on SCCA.com for the event.

The reason I was asking was based upon the results in STS. The class winner (Andrew Hahn) was ranked 31st, while the 2nd place (David Whitener) was ranked #6, for the Super Challenge, and I found that odd.

So either the results for the Super Challenge are wrong, or the results for the class are wrong.
User avatar
Jayson Woodruff
Posts: 1754
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 51

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Jayson Woodruff »

I think the numbers for the bracket are upside down, but it's in the right order. Try from top to bottom:
1
32

16
17

8
25

9
24

4
29

13
20

5
28

12
21

2
31

15
18

7
26

10
23

3
30

14
19

6
27

11
22

Seems to make more sence.

Jay W
Craig Naylor wrote:That's what I though, and then surmised after looking at the rules. But... then I was confused based upon the results posted on SCCA.com for the event.

The reason I was asking was based upon the results in STS. The class winner (Andrew Hahn) was ranked 31st, while the 2nd place (David Whitener) was ranked #6, for the Super Challenge, and I found that odd.

So either the results for the Super Challenge are wrong, or the results for the class are wrong.
User avatar
Christine Grice
King of Fastrack!
Posts: 1932
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 17

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Christine Grice »

Jayson Woodruff wrote:I think the numbers for the bracket are upside down, but it's in the right order. Try from top to bottom:
...
Seems to make more sence.

Jay W
This matches what the Nationals Staff was talking about at El Toro. They felt that it was actually a detriment to the top qualifier to run last in the first round. If the top qualifier makes it to the final round, it gives the first run off pairing more time to cool down.
~Christine Grice
2006 Mitsubishi Evolution, Berry Family Racing/Hoosier/ChaseCam
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Craig Naylor »

Jay that still would not work.

Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
User avatar
Rick Brown
Current Solo Director
Posts: 5117
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 240
Location: Lake Elsinore, CA

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Rick Brown »

Why don't you just email Howard?
Since light is faster than sound...many people look bright until they speak...
User avatar
KJ Christopher
Executive Board Member
Posts: 2818
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Club: No$
Car#: 11
Location: Redondo Beach, CA

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by KJ Christopher »

Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.

Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Are Andrew and David still driving the same car?
kj
Use the email link. I don't read nor get notified of PMs.
Former No$ Club Rep | Former SCCA Area 11 Director |Former CSCC Solo Chair
Caged Z Motorsports - automotive consultation
The ACME Special Now with Super Speed Vitamins
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Craig Naylor »

Rick Brown wrote:Why don't you just email Howard?
What kind of workbench racing would that be? :lol:
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Craig Naylor »

KJ Christopher wrote:
Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.

Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Are Andrew and David still driving the same car?
So many ways that could be answered.

Yes - They co drove :thumbup:
Maybe - The photo's look like the same car, but I guess a new "car" with the same paint job could have replaced the prior one. :computer:
Not for long - If Andrew keeps beating David the car owner. }:)
User avatar
Pete Loney
Posts: 1083
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 777
Location: Torrance

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Pete Loney »

Craig Naylor wrote:
KJ Christopher wrote:
Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.

Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Are Andrew and David still driving the same car?
So many ways that could be answered.

Yes - They co drove :thumbup:
Maybe - The photo's look like the same car, but I guess a new "car" with the same paint job could have replaced the prior one. :computer:
Not for long - If Andrew keeps beating David the car owner. }:)
Partially a new Car, they were running Rivals!
2021 Season: 777 ES | 1999 Miata, 10th Anniversary #3987/7500
MIATAROADSTER.COM
User avatar
Jayson Woodruff
Posts: 1754
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 51

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo

Post by Jayson Woodruff »

Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.

Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
I see David in 17th seed under 'my' schedule.

Jay W
Post Reply