CST Who's running List.

Chad Stubblefield · Post by **Chad Stubblefield** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:04 pm

Just want to see who planning on running this class next season.

Curt Luther · Post by **Curt Luther** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:23 am

Do you mean CST?

Thomas Barrett · Post by **Thomas Barrett** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:49 am

I am planning on running in CST.

You beat me too many times this year. Find someone else to beat up on

What are you going to run with since you are selling your Mazda?????

Randy Chase · Post by **Randy Chase** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:48 am

Maybe!

Chad Stubblefield · Post by **Chad Stubblefield** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:53 am

Curt Luther wrote:Do you mean CST?

Uh
we have been calling it st/csm
its new to me so.... CST then.

Chad Stubblefield · Post by **Chad Stubblefield** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:57 am

Randy Chase wrote:Maybe!

The noble?

Mako Koiwai · Post by **Mako Koiwai** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:36 am

Hi was thinking of running his GT3, but Kumho R's (18") are cheaper then his oem street tires! Not much choice in ST tires for a car like that. So ... CSM or ASP for him.

Michael Sullivan · Post by **Michael Sullivan** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:53 pm

I'll be running the Mustang.

Sean Goodbody · Post by **Sean Goodbody** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:56 pm

Mako Koiwai wrote:Hi was thinking of running his GT3, but Kumho R's (18") are cheaper then his oem street tires! Not much choice in ST tires for a car like that. So ... CSM or ASP for him.

The 18's he'd be buying for the Kumho's also opens up an ST tire option or two... not that anyone in their right minds would prefer that over R's on a GT3.

Ken Motonishi · Post by **Ken Motonishi** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:24 am

Trying to find info on this new class?

Are the Sup Regs going to be availble for 2009 any time soon? Is there a whole new series of classes that end with a "T"?

Curt Luther · Post by **Curt Luther** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:00 am

Ken Motonishi wrote:Trying to find info on this new class?

Are the Sup Regs going to be availble for 2009 any time soon? Is there a whole new series of classes that end with a "T"?

The 2009 Supp Regs will be up in about two weeks. The new *ST classes will be this:

CALIFORNIA STREET TOURING (CST)
Vehicles eligible for CST must comply with the rules of CSM, with the exception that all of the tires mounted on the car must have a TREADWEAR number of 140 or higher molded by the manufacturer on the sidewall.

SUPER STREET TOURING (SST)
Vehicles eligible for SST must comply with Para. 14 (Street Touring) and specifically Para. 14.13 (Street Touring Ultra) of the Solo National Rulebook but are not limited to the displacement, amount of seating and excluded vehicles rules of that paragraph. The class is open to all vehicles, including those that are not otherwise eligible for Street Touring classes, but are subject to Street Touring Ultra limitations.

Ken Motonishi · Post by **Ken Motonishi** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:07 am

OIC.

Very interesting.

Steve Ekstrand · Post by **Steve Ekstrand** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:15 am

Extra large Kumhonnies Award for the driver taking either SST or CST with an ST legal Civie.

Jason Flores · Post by **Jason Flores** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:39 pm

Steve Ekstrand wrote:Extra large Kumhonnies Award for the driver taking either SST or CST with an ST legal Civie.

We could take ALL of our civic there and let the rest of the normal ST class battle it out sans CIVIC much like people who move to PAX class...

...SIde note...I like how Mr Moto ask a question that has been covered over and over and we conveniently post the info, but if it was some noob someone would tell them to search....just funny...its ok, it not wrong, I also do pull over and let him pass when driving on the fwy to give him the right of way..

Sebastian Rios · Post by **Sebastian Rios** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:42 pm

Steve Ekstrand wrote:Extra large Kumhonnies Award for the driver taking either SST or CST with an ST legal Civie.

I could have sworn the SST class wording had language against "running up a class" (no st, sts, stx, stu allowed). I think this was to keep Dick Hayter and Rick "The Awesome One" Jung from taking their fully prepped cars and destroying the fledgling class.

Michael Palero · Post by **Michael Palero** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:50 pm

Jason Flores wrote:
Steve Ekstrand wrote:Extra large Kumhonnies Award for the driver taking either SST or CST with an ST legal Civie.
We could take ALL of our civic there and let the rest of the normal ST class battle it out sans CIVIC much like people who move to PAX class...

...SIde note...I like how Mr Moto ask a question that has been covered over and over and we conveniently post the info, but if it was some noob someone would tell them to search....just funny...its ok, it not wrong, I also do pull over and let him pass when driving on the fwy to give him the right of way..

You already know the answer to this!

Speed politics... what's the incentive to help out someone slower right?!

Kurt Rahn · Post by **Kurt Rahn** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:26 pm

Dick Hayter

Is that Max's manly, Corvette-driving alter ego?

Steve Ekstrand · Post by **Steve Ekstrand** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:37 pm

Dick Hayter?

Team Blew lets a guy with that name in?

Max Hayter · Post by **Max Hayter** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:03 pm

Steve Ekstrand wrote:Dick Hayter?

Team Blew lets a guy with that name in?

:unimpressed:

Richard Jung · Post by **Richard Jung** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:18 pm

Max Hayter wrote:
Steve Ekstrand wrote:Dick Hayter?

Team Blew lets a guy with that name in?
:unimpressed:

Hey, I'd take it as a complement, better than going the other way. ;)

Curt Luther · Post by **Curt Luther** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:55 am

Sebastian Rios wrote:
Steve Ekstrand wrote:Extra large Kumhonnies Award for the driver taking either SST or CST with an ST legal Civie.
I could have sworn the SST class wording had language against "running up a class" (no st, sts, stx, stu allowed). I think this was to keep Dick Hayter and Rick "The Awesome One" Jung from taking their fully prepped cars and destroying the fledgling class.

Originally it did, but it was an oversight, not intentional. We decided to change that in that it goes against the current national policy of allowing it. Also, didn't see the reason for making it exclusionary and it could also help in the data collection that some national types might be doing on making a similar type National class.

Sebastian Rios · Post by **Sebastian Rios** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:31 am

Curt Luther wrote:Originally it did, but it was an oversight, not intentional. We decided to change that in that it goes against the current national policy of allowing it. Also, didn't see the reason for making it exclusionary and it could also help in the data collection that some national types might be doing on making a similar type National class.

Right on, I think thats better anyway.

Cal Club Autocross Forums

CST Who's running List.

CST Who's running List.

Re: ST/CSM Who's running List.

Re: ST/CSM Who's running List.

Re: ST/CSM Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: ST/CSM Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.

Re: CST Who's running List.