4th run, my best of day. 90.371 sec. I never got the turnaround at 0:23 correct... first two runs I blew past it and the last two I slowed down waaaaay too much.
Congrats to Kurt for another win in SK2! Watch your back, buddy.

Moderators: Mike Simanyi, Christine Grice, Rick Brown
THAT is a GREAT run, Davin! Maybe I can't tell from the video, but it looked as though you got the 0:23 "turnaround" quite well on this run, and your time would certainly suggest that was true. I'm amazed at your smoothness and that "newBee" Miata has power. Certainly compared to my oldie. BTW, how did you like the Star Specs? Wait til it's warmer weatherwise.Davin Swanson wrote:http://youtu.be/3rkOYO9BgXg
4th run, my best of day. 90.371 sec. I never got the turnaround at 0:23 correct... first two runs I blew past it and the last two I slowed down waaaaay too much.
Congrats to Kurt for another win in SK2! Watch your back, buddy.
Davin, you kicked butt today! I couldn't believe some of the times you put down. You're learning fast!Davin Swanson wrote:Congrats to Kurt for another win in SK2! Watch your back, buddy.
Might have been interesting to you Kurt.......had me spinning in my chair before the end of the first slalom.Kurt Rahn wrote:I thought this was interesting to watch. My last run and Max's last run side by side (so to speak). Same car, same course, same conditions. You can get a good idea how little things ( poor car position, getting behind, braking too late, lifting off the gas when you should have been flat, how soon you can get on the gas out of a corner, etc.) can add up quickly to make your time longer.
http://vimeo.com/38808624" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Crap... TWO Rahns to beat! Kurt, can't you tell Max to take up, like, knitting or something instead of autox? }:)George Schilling wrote: But it will be interesting for you to keep that and compare the same thing a couple years from now. Folks may not remember that I used to beat Joey routinely. Now the only way I can beat him is if he doesn't show up.
Oh, I know it's coming. I have to get my licks in now while I canGeorge Schilling wrote:Might have been interesting to you Kurt.......had me spinning in my chair before the end of the first slalom.Kurt Rahn wrote:I thought this was interesting to watch. My last run and Max's last run side by side (so to speak). Same car, same course, same conditions. You can get a good idea how little things ( poor car position, getting behind, braking too late, lifting off the gas when you should have been flat, how soon you can get on the gas out of a corner, etc.) can add up quickly to make your time longer.
http://vimeo.com/38808624" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But it will be interesting for you to keep that and compare the same thing a couple years from now. Folks may not remember that I used to beat Joey routinely. Now the only way I can beat him is if he doesn't show up.
Yeah... every time I think I drove pretty well, I go home and look at the data with the video and just do one big <headdesk>.Kurt Rahn wrote:You can get a good idea how little things ( poor car position, getting behind, braking too late, lifting off the gas when you should have been flat, how soon you can get on the gas out of a corner, etc.) can add up quickly to make your time longer.
Thanks for keeping the announcements going at the end. Priceless.
Amen! I've got over 4 years worth of data from the evo and every single run has some sort of mistake in it.Leonard Cachola wrote:Yeah... every time I think I drove pretty well, I go home and look at the data with the video and just do one big <headdesk>.Kurt Rahn wrote:You can get a good idea how little things ( poor car position, getting behind, braking too late, lifting off the gas when you should have been flat, how soon you can get on the gas out of a corner, etc.) can add up quickly to make your time longer.
Hi Curt, welcome to the addiction! Hope you had fun and will make it out to more events. Were you able to get any instruction during your runs?Curt Thompson wrote:Last Run:
http://youtu.be/cK-jhpkadd8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
that's cheating ...Marshall Grice wrote:and then i started putting my data next to Toms.
Based on Sunday's results, it works quite well though.Julian Manolov wrote:that's cheating ...Marshall Grice wrote:and then i started putting my data next to Toms.
Understood. For the record, I didn't ask her to record anything and if she had warned me what she was going to do I would have told her not to. In any case, it won't happen in the future. Funnily enough, the video in question is about 90 seconds of dashboard and totally pointless.Leonard Cachola wrote:Hi Curt, welcome to the addiction! Hope you had fun and will make it out to more events. Were you able to get any instruction during your runs?Curt Thompson wrote:Last Run:
http://youtu.be/cK-jhpkadd8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
One comment on your video, though - in the future, no hand-held cameras for either your passengers or you during your run, please. It's a safety issue. The last thing you want is for that camera to become a projectile and hit you, your passenger, or a course worker. Thanks.
I always thought this was a strange rule - we're wearing helmets and who can't take a body shot from a 1-pound camera (or much less in the case of a smartphone)?Leonard Cachola wrote:One comment on your video, though - in the future, no hand-held cameras for either your passengers or you during your run, please. It's a safety issue. The last thing you want is for that camera to become a projectile and hit you, your passenger, or a course worker. Thanks.
Maybe more likely than that is a case where the phone/camera slips out of the passenger's hands and slides around on the dashboard distracting the driver, possibly endangering the courseworkers who expect the driver to be paying attention to the course. Plus, there's the tearing up as you watch your $600 phone fly out the window at 60MPH.Will Kalman wrote:I always thought this was a strange rule - we're wearing helmets and who can't take a body shot from a 1-pound camera (or much less in the case of a smartphone)?Leonard Cachola wrote:One comment on your video, though - in the future, no hand-held cameras for either your passengers or you during your run, please. It's a safety issue. The last thing you want is for that camera to become a projectile and hit you, your passenger, or a course worker. Thanks.
1lb cameras are a relatively new thing. i think when the rule came about people were still leaning video cameras on their shoulders.Will Kalman wrote:I always thought this was a strange rule - we're wearing helmets and who can't take a body shot from a 1-pound camera (or much less in the case of a smartphone)?Leonard Cachola wrote:One comment on your video, though - in the future, no hand-held cameras for either your passengers or you during your run, please. It's a safety issue. The last thing you want is for that camera to become a projectile and hit you, your passenger, or a course worker. Thanks.
if it was not working well it wouldn't be cheating ...Rick Brown wrote:Based on Sunday's results, it works quite well though.Julian Manolov wrote:that's cheating ...Marshall Grice wrote:and then i started putting my data next to Toms.