Eh, Sk should be just as expensive as running stock class. Minus a couple hundred bucks for a set of tires. If it was a national class you would need the same expensive shocks and swaybars and the same extra set of wheels with shaved tires on them. believe me, i've run street tire classes, and we went through more sets of tires on Max's STU car than we do in Toby's FP car. Toby's car could run for a full local season on one set of race tires, it's the 3 drivers and the nationals events that make it pricey, tire-wise.. but then again that's what co-drivers are for.Kurt Rahn wrote:There are logistical issues with a kart, since you can't just hop in and drive it to the event. You have to look at the other costs and hassles involved in getting it where it needs to go. In addition, since a kart weighs about as much as a set of big-boy car tires, unless you're under 150 pounds, you have no hope of being competitive. You or I could have all the skills of Ayrton Senna, and neither of us could beat our local field. ST is nothing approximating cheap, unless you're comparing it to the cost of running competitively in FP or SM. If people had problems prepping their cars to compete against nationally prepped SK cars, they'd have a coronary if they saw the bill for prepping a competitive ST car. I know, because I seriously considered prepping a CRX for STS. SK is attractice because even fully prepped, you can still use it as your daily driver.Aaron Goldsmith wrote:If an inexpensive national class is what you want, F125 is about as cheap as it gets. ST is pretty cheap too.
I don't know who told you I thought i was a good driver, I haven't won an event in years.
