Page 2 of 3
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:54 pm
by Steve Ekstrand
very sad....
And if this turns out to be arson.....
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:07 pm
by Mako Koiwai
Smoke up to supposedly 20,000' ... at 7:15 ... from USC ... on the way back from the PCA OC AX:
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:13 pm
by Bob Beamesderfer
Smoke was visible from the 15 south of Corona; time was about 7:30-8:00.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:27 am
by Rick Brown


This has been parked on Lake Elsinore for the last month and is now helping fight the local fires. Privately owned, under contract to forestry service I believe. Can scoop up over 7000 gallons in 30 seconds and return to fire. Mission is initial suppression. After the Spruce Goose, next largest amphibian plane ever built and was a military bomber. Can stay up for 4 to 6 hours on one fuel load.
http://www.martinmars.com/firefighting.htm
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:11 am
by Dennis R. Brown, DDS

- CIMG1987 b.jpg (304.11 KiB) Viewed 10225 times
The Sun during the Santiago Cyn Fire.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:19 am
by Dennis R. Brown, DDS

- CIMG1962 b.jpg (229.93 KiB) Viewed 10229 times
Santiago Fire from 2007, at Portola and Lake Forrest.
I've seen some very nasty fires here in So Cal in my 12 years. I was living near Griffith Park when they had that nasty fire that almost burned the Hollywood sign. Then while I had my office (practice) in San Diego County back in 2003 for the Cedar Fire. I remember coming out seeing my car covered in soooo much ash that it looked like snow. Finally, my most recent experience was the Santiago/Modjeska Cyn Fire in 2007 because I was surrounded by that fire on 3 sides. I think KJ lives out in that area, and he could probably attest to the how intense it looked!
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:00 am
by Glenn Duensing
Today the Evergreen 747 (Tanker 979) will be making drops. All four VLATs (Very Large Air Tanker) should be in the air. The 747 hold twice the load of the DC-10 (tankers 910 & 911). The other VLAT is the Martin Mars.
Side note on the Martin Mars. Craig Angel flew from Hawaii to Korea on one of the Mars.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:21 am
by John Coffey
Google fire map mashup:
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&gl ... 9cded17ce4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:42 am
by Steve Ekstrand
I never get the delays getting the aircraft in....
The Canadian super scoopers contract didn't start til 9/4, but I guess they managed to get them a couple days early. 5 times the helicopter water load, but very fast cycle time if the right water source is available.
Wasn't the Martin Mars just sitting on lake Elsinore all this time???
Seems like California should have its on fleet of dedicated firefighting aircraft. Out of service commercial airliners are CHEAP right now... How hard is it to convert them? Get a bunch of crazy Jeff Barco's to fly them!
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:08 am
by Glenn Duensing
The Martin Mars has been working the Hemet fire and has some minor maintenance work to do as she just had new equipment installed before coming south , the 747 has just completed a world tour and was in Sacramento for some NorCal fires and tanker 911 has just been sitting waiting to go to work. 911 doesn't have a contact so it has a day to day contact. If they use it, it's a minimum of 5 days or $330,000. Tanker 910 has a 90 day contact with CalFire. The C-130's still don't have the new MAFFS system.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:45 pm
by John Coffey
That particular Martin Mars is the old Hawaiian Mars II built in 1946.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:03 pm
by Craig Naylor
Glenn Duensing wrote:DC-10 is out of Adelando/Victorville/George AFB. Takes about 20 minutes to reload and refuel before they are in the air again. Others are out of Norton and Fox Field (Lancaster)
While I won't dispute your comments.... I heard on the radio that the DC-10s are privately owned, and are based out of Murrieta, the 747 out of Perris. The 747 is supposedly scooping out of a lake near Perris, but not Lake Perris.in Riverside CA.
They stated the name.... but it didn't stick, as I had never heard of it. \
The concept of watching a 747 dragging water on the move sounds awesome... and extremely scary at the same time.
We have smaller propeller's out of Nevada, New Mexico, and Wyoming on the scene.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:32 pm
by Steve Ekstrand
No way a 747 scoops water out of a lake. I can only do that on Flight Simulator... Under the Golden Gate dodging shark fins.
http://www.evergreenaviation.com/supertanker/whyst.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:55 pm
by Mako Koiwai
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:31 pm
by Andrew Bingham
Seems like California should have its on fleet of dedicated firefighting aircraft. Out of service commercial airliners are CHEAP right now... How hard is it to convert them? Get a bunch of crazy Jeff Barco's to fly them!
We do.... California Dept of Forestry has 23 S-2T tankers, 11 helicopters, and 14 scout/lead planes...
http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire_protection/ ... rogram.php
What I don't understand is why when this fire STARTED on Wednesday/Thursday, our STATE FUNDED resources (which are dedicated to putting out small fires before they become a problem) weren't used to put it out when it was only a few hundred acres.
Probably because it's on FEDERAL land... I haven't seen any of the CAL FIRE S-2Ts or their scout planes dropping on this fire... It's all been USFS contracted P-2s, P-3s, and the VLATs...
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:38 pm
by Glenn Duensing
Craig Naylor wrote:Glenn Duensing wrote:DC-10 is out of Adelando/Victorville/George AFB. Takes about 20 minutes to reload and refuel before they are in the air again. Others are out of Norton and Fox Field (Lancaster)
While I won't dispute your comments.... I heard on the radio that the DC-10s are privately owned, and are based out of Murrieta, the 747 out of Perris. The 747 is supposedly scooping out of a lake near Perris, but not Lake Perris.in Riverside CA.
They stated the name.... but it didn't stick, as I had never heard of it. \
The concept of watching a 747 dragging water on the move sounds awesome... and extremely scary at the same time.
We have smaller propeller's out of Nevada, New Mexico, and Wyoming on the scene.
Don't believe everything you hear on the radio.

The strip at Murrieta is too small for DC-10s. Ryan Field in Hemet is a CDF base with the S-2 Trackers of Aero Union. The DC-10s are owned by 10 Tanker Air Carrier out of Adelanto (
http://www.10tanker.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;). Evergreen's 747 (
http://www.evergreenaviation.com/supertanker/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) is having to go to McClellan to reload as Adelanto is too busy with Tankers 910 and 911. Norton could handle land the 747 but the loading area is too small for a 747. Martin Mars is the water plane.
The 747 isn't the best as it can't fly low enough or slow enough to be as good as the DC-10. However if anybody really knows Evergren Aviation, aka "Spook Airlines", the 747 is also being developed for some interesting other uses, hence the different delivery system.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:25 am
by Steve Ekstrand
The thing about the 747 with the advanced avionics is that it theoretically can drop at night.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:23 am
by Mako Koiwai
Time lapse of the smoke ... but where's the time lapse showing the fire line moving at night ?!
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-322595
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:40 am
by Bob Beamesderfer
Porno for pyros:
http://vimeo.com/6325431" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:02 pm
by Kurt Rahn

No wonder I can't breathe.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:20 pm
by Mako Koiwai
Nice Bob ... just what I wanted to see ... although a longer one ... longer intervals between frames for a longer period of time ... hours ... of a/the fire line moving quickly across a mountain face would be even more amazing. The problem with time lapse is controlling the exposure, ie. the overly bright flare-ups towards the end of your link ... that are hard to predict. One can't use auto exposure ... as that gives you exposures all over the place.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:43 pm
by Theo O.
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:05 pm
by Will Kalman
For perspective - 20,000 gallons is a decent sized POOL. They're flying a POOL through the air and dropping it in seconds!
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:18 pm
by Mako Koiwai
Pool, not swimming pool. I'm pretty sure my moms swimming pool/jacuzzi is 50k
Re: PASADENA FIRE!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:54 pm
by Bob Beamesderfer
Mako Koiwai wrote:Nice Bob ... just what I wanted to see ... although a longer one ... longer intervals between frames for a longer period of time ... hours ... of a/the fire line moving quickly across a mountain face would be even more amazing. The problem with time lapse is controlling the exposure, ie. the overly bright flare-ups towards the end of your link ... that are hard to predict. One can't use auto exposure ... as that gives you exposures all over the place.
Apparently the guy made that one has others posted on Vimeo.