Jayson Woodruff wrote:Steve Ekstrand wrote:And it would appear that in some cases our regulars expressed those concerns and had changes made to courses.
There's one case of this I know. Tom P, who was working for me at the time, advised the course designer of a section he thought was unsafe during set up. The section was changed before any car hit the course. This shouldn't make us 'concerned', are there any other case of this you're referring to?
Lets air this out. I've been to several SpeedVentures events. I go there as a hired contractor to supply the equipment, timing and some support personnel. I do it as a 'for profit' business. 'For Profit' is in quotes because I don't normally take any money home, the cash gets re-invested in the equipment so I can continue to run the RallyCross program and the occasional AutoX.
So far most of the SV events have been ran by Emilio, who is a past SCCA Solo racer and is very good at being safety minded. If I had omni-powers, I wouldn't hesitate in giving Emilo a SSS license with only paperwork training. I've contracted to 12 or 13 speedventure autoxes and have not seen one incident and of the 9-10 I've been to, haven't even seen a close call. They don't have a safety program in place like the SCCA does, which inherently makes them risky. They're only as safe as the guys running the event are.
SpeedVenture's standard method of operating is to use the inside AAA lot for autox at a discount while operating on the road courses. I've basically stolen that business model and was able to get the AAA lot even cheaper than they do, which is a risk to my personal income. So we're at a position now to under cut SpeedVentures at their own model, a group we consider direct competition.
Jay W
The for hire(craigslist I thought) workers at the SV auto-x events need a cheat sheet for each position I think.
I ran one of these events back in early 2008.
The starter was not looking downstream at all when launching cars. I politeley explained that to him around 3 times over. ESL issue.
Secondly, this is just an annoyance, a on course worker, on the fly, added a pointer cone to a optional slalom and then proceeded
to double up the slalom cones while cars were running. His explanation for each course change respectively was interesting, he though he new
how to read the course and everyone was supposed to go the way he marked it for the added pointer, and he thought if he doubled the slalom cones, they
wouldn't fall over as often DOH

I respcectfully went on course and explained why not to do both of those things quickly.
I spotted these things before Emilio did and helped him out by talking to the guys myself.