Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

General discussions about Solo

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

User avatar
Will Kalman
Posts: 1210
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 232

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Will Kalman »

Good luck finding a floor that is both flat and level - we live on a sphere!
User avatar
Dan Shaw
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Car#: 427
Location: Silicon Valley

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Dan Shaw »

Mako Koiwai wrote:That place in Pasadena is our beloved Island Tires ... where they do GREAT tire mounting on the cheap. You never have to remind them to line up the Dots with the tire stem. I guess they just don't do great alignment work?

I put a BIG front bar in Andrew's SK2 Miata ... he seems very happy with it ... and can't wait to challenge in SK2 on Sunday.
I hope you replaced the sway bar mounts!! Drill the spot welds and replace them with blocks if you havent alreAdy. It's fun not having a front bar for drifts but good luck doing much of anything else. :lol:
2017 MX-5 - #427 ???
User avatar
Steve Ekstrand
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 7482
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 15
Location: This space left intentionally blank
Contact:

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Steve Ekstrand »

Vette forums? Who the hell is on the vette forums? Those guys with chrome grills over their taillights and add on wings?

Seriously? Oh the vette forum has Sam Strano and Andy Hollis and Guy Ankeny and Jim McKamey and....

I didn't think so....

Island is great. Jose and Andrew always take care of me and my family and any autocrossers I send their way. Unfortunately they don't do alignments or at least they don't have faith enough in their alignment work to ever let me use it. There's a big hint in that. :(
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
User avatar
Steve Ekstrand
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 7482
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 15
Location: This space left intentionally blank
Contact:

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Steve Ekstrand »

Tom Denham wrote:
Marshall Grice wrote:
Bob Plante wrote: Anyone? Expert? Garage floor good enough?

:ibrightdea:
depends on the garage. Is your garage floor flat?
There is no such thing as a flat garage floor, they all have a slope for water drainage, how much depends on the the codes at the time the house or garage was built.
And I have a 70yo house... After the built-in slope you have ground movement and settling.
But most garage floors are close enough that you can compensate pretty easily with linoleum flooring tiles. Just need a good level to help you figure it out.
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
User avatar
Bill Martin
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: GRA
Car#: 74

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Bill Martin »

Will Kalman wrote:Good luck finding a floor that is both flat and level - we live on a sphere!
No, we live on a solid polygon. My tiny section is flat and level.
User avatar
Will Kalman
Posts: 1210
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 232

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Will Kalman »

Bill Martin wrote:
Will Kalman wrote:Good luck finding a floor that is both flat and level - we live on a sphere!
No, we live on a solid polygon. My tiny section is flat and level.
Gravity effectively acts from a point so there's no way every point on your flat section can be perpendicular to gravity (level) unless it's curved, but then it's not flat! But I'm thinking you're not losing much time on course by doing setup up in suboptimal conditions ;) :lol:
User avatar
Marshall Grice
Former CSCC Overall Champion
Posts: 1617
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 11

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Marshall Grice »

Will Kalman wrote: Gravity effectively acts from a point so there's no way every point on your flat section can be perpendicular to gravity (level) unless it's curved, but then it's not flat! But I'm thinking you're not losing much time on course by doing setup up in suboptimal conditions ;) :lol:
man and I thought I was splitting hairs in this discussion! :lol:
Jason Rhoades
Posts: 156
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Car#: 0

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Jason Rhoades »

These threads are fun. First it was inferior-sized tires, then narrower-than-stock wheels, now it's buggering ride height and alignment on the fastest Z06 at 2009 Nats. Can't wait to see what's in store for us next - ECU reflash for cylinder deactivation? :?
User avatar
Jason Isley BS RX8
Posts: 1129
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Car#: 0
Location: Coto de Caza
Contact:

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Jason Isley BS RX8 »

Jason Rhoades wrote:These threads are fun. First it was inferior-sized tires, then narrower-than-stock wheels, now it's buggering ride height and alignment on the fastest Z06 at 2009 Nats. Can't wait to see what's in store for us next - ECU reflash for cylinder deactivation? :?
No kidding. If he wanted to screw with something he should have focused his misguided efforts on the Miata. The important thing to remember here is that Karen needs our sympathy, as her once proven Z06 is now no better than a stock Z06 off the street - and maybe worse. }:)
Bill Schenker
Former CSCC Overall Champion
Posts: 1681
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 14
Location: Corona del Mar
Contact:

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Bill Schenker »

Will Kalman wrote:
Bill Martin wrote:
Will Kalman wrote:Good luck finding a floor that is both flat and level - we live on a sphere!
No, we live on a solid polygon. My tiny section is flat and level.
Gravity effectively acts from a point so there's no way every point on your flat section can be perpendicular to gravity (level) unless it's curved, but then it's not flat! But I'm thinking you're not losing much time on course by doing setup up in suboptimal conditions ;) :lol:

Will Kalman: the uncredited cast member of CBS' "The Big Bang Theory"...
MiataRoadster/OS Giken/ChaseCam/
2001 Mazda Miata
#14 DP
User avatar
Mako Koiwai
Posts: 6490
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 34
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Contact:

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Mako Koiwai »

We used SCCA Stock class legal sway bar mount reinforcements ... from Racing Beat. They have two types, one legal one not.
User avatar
Leslie Cohen
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: GRA
Car#: 137
Location: Cardiff by the Sea, CA
Contact:

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Leslie Cohen »

In 10 years of owning a C5 Z06 have never once had car corner weighted. But then again, I like to drive, not tinker on cars. Also, the one time my car was measured we discovered how well-balanced it came from the factory.
Leslie
ST(S) Civic/SS Z06
User avatar
Bob Pl
Posts: 697
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: GRA
Car#: 26

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Bob Pl »

Along with what Leslie posted re: corner weights, I was wondering, if you set ride height perfect, THEN you corner weight using the adjuster screws, haven't you just screwed your ride heights?

Even if you ballast the car to achieve corner weight, isn't that (adding/moving/removing) weight going to affect ride height?

I know you can get pretty close on a race car with almost unlimited height/weight adjustments, but with stock cars it seems like you get into an endless loop of adjusting.

:?:
User avatar
Mako Koiwai
Posts: 6490
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 34
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Contact:

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Mako Koiwai »

From the Z06 board:
I had the same problem with my 04 ZO6. First of all equal ride heighth is not as important as balanced corner weight. I knew I was going to raise the Lf corner in order to get the proper balance.
I first removed both frt adj bolts and measured them and found one was more crushed (shorter) than the other. I put that one on the rf and lowered it all the way. I did the same with the Lf, then I set the two rears to my desired height 4-5/8".
Then I raised the Lf until i reached the goal I was looking for. I built ramps for my scales so each time I took it for a 20min drive to settle the suspension I would have to jack up the car to put it on the scales which would change all the settings.

[img]Image:%20http://i644.photobucket.com/albums/uu163/degoetz/scan0001.jpg[/img]

Ride height with driver in car.
LF 4-1/4" RF 4-3/16"
LR 4-5/8" RR 4-5/8"
User avatar
Mako Koiwai
Posts: 6490
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 34
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Contact:

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Mako Koiwai »

Ideally you want to corner balance with the least amount of change to ones preferred ride heights ... which might mean taking a little from more than one corner rather than only a large change at one corner.

I'm hoping that corner balancing will allow me to close that 1/2" gap between the Front Left and Right Front.

I've got the Team Blew scales now so I'm going at it this afternoon ....
User avatar
Mako Koiwai
Posts: 6490
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 34
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Contact:

Re: Just Double Checking ... on a Corner Balanced car ...

Post by Mako Koiwai »

The front spring is offset to the right by a quarter inch ... that would make the shorter left end noticeably stiffer, correct ?

I tried to more the spring an 1/8" to the left ... unsuccessfully ... stopped just short of removing the spring. I did remove the adjusting screws to make sure they were the same length ... and one side wasn't worn down more then the other side.

Trying to deal with the spring took up enough time that I didn't start corner balancing.

So with the right adjuster all the way up, lowest ride heights setting ... in front ... the right front is still about 0.5" higher then the left, even though the left adjuster has five turns, clockwise, of car raising adjustment added. :?
Post Reply