Mike Simanyi wrote:Being on the SEB, I can confirm what they're all telling you Ed. Run RTR if you are in favor of street tires in Stock.
Mike
I totally respect yours and others opinions. As you well know, street tires is ALREADY allowed in stock. Since the very beginning of the RT discussion, I have been trying to understand why we are being lumped into an SK1/SK2 INDEXED type of class to prove interest in "street tire in stock". From my little pee-brain point-of-view, it appears that we're headed toward a permanent SK type of street tire indexed class, as opposed to a street tires only in stock set of classes. No one has explained to me that that is NOT the case. Even though I have asked, even at SCCA.
Just today, in a email reply to KJ, I said that I don't have a major problem with running in RT RWD. I'm just looking for a little more detailed explaination than because "you should".
Frankly, I don't understand why everyone is pushing so hard. If you look at the entrants in RT so far, it's a mile long. My adding to the list will not seal the deal. I have been on record here and SD and Miata.net stating that my personal objective in ANY autocross event is to see how close I can come to competitiors who are on R-Comps, while I am running street tires. Why is that such a problem?
In the end, on subjects such as this, when it is a SEB/SCCA "test", I want to be a team player. But, for reference, although a bit redundant, here is a portion of my email to KJ this afternoon...
If the intent of the SEB is to determine the level of street tire interest in the stock classes, why is the test this year based on index? Stock classes can compete NOW on street tires without an index. It's allowance of those pesky R-Comps that get in the way.
My problem is that I think we're going to wind up with a National level permanent SK1 and SK2 in order to come up with a street tire only formula for stock classes, as opposed to ES, et al, where only street tires are allowed.
Ed