Cal Club Autocross Forums

.862

SM2/SSM got smited.

2009:
SS 0.856 ASP 0.866 XP 0.882 AM 1.000
AS 0.843 BSP 0.859 BP 0.868 BM 0.944
BS 0.835 CSP 0.862 CP 0.864 CM 0.907
CS 0.837 DSP 0.845 DP 0.865 DM 0.900
DS 0.819 ESP 0.846 EP 0.861 EM 0.894
ES 0.823 FSP 0.831 FP 0.872 FM 0.903
FS 0.833 GP 0.841 FSAE 0.954
GS 0.821 ST (STS) 0.818
HS 0.802 STS (STS2) 0.820 F125 0.957
STX 0.822 FJA 0.860
STU 0.836 FJB 0.832
SM 0.867 FJC 0.778
SSM (SM2) 0.876

2008
SS 0.852 ASP 0.862 XP 0.882 AM 1.000
AS 0.842 BSP 0.858 BP 0.866 BM 0.937
BS 0.832 CSP 0.856 CP 0.864 CM 0.904
CS 0.831 DSP 0.843 DP 0.863 DM 0.890
DS 0.812 ESP 0.841 EP 0.861 EM 0.887
ES 0.817 FSP 0.833 FP 0.872 FM 0.895
FS 0.821 GP 0.847 FSAE 0.946
GS 0.815 STS 0.816
HS 0.792 STS2 0.818 F125 0.948
STX 0.820 FJA 0.855
STU 0.830 FJB 0.828
SM 0.860 FJC 0.770
SM2 0.867

Any more complaints about CSP PAX being soft deserve hard blows.

*Isn't there a table tag I can use?

I predict Tom Berry will win overall PAX in 2009 driving a BSP Evo. ;)

Edit: Nice scoop Leonard!

This makes a lot of sense:

CSP 0.862
CP 0.864

Bob Beamesderfer wrote:This makes a lot of sense:

CSP 0.862
CP 0.864

It makes sense for HPT, for Lincoln Airpark, maybe not so much.

This is easier to look at...

2008 2009 Change

SS 0.852 0.856 0.004
AS 0.842 0.843 0.001
BS 0.832 0.835 0.003
CS 0.831 0.837 0.006
DS 0.812 0.819 0.007
ES 0.817 0.823 0.006
FS 0.821 0.833 0.012
GS 0.815 0.821 0.006
HS 0.792 0.802 0.010
Average Stock 0.006

ASP 0.862 0.866 0.004
BSP 0.858 0.859 0.001
CSP 0.856 0.862 0.006
DSP 0.843 0.845 0.002
ESP 0.841 0.846 0.005
FSP 0.833 0.831 -0.002
Average SP 0.003

ST (STS) 0.816 0.818 0.002
STS (STS2) 0.818 0.82 0.002
STX 0.82 0.822 0.002
STU 0.83 0.836 0.006
SM 0.86 0.867 0.007
SSM (SM2) 0.867 0.876 0.009
Average ST/SM 0.005

XP 0.882 0.882 0.000
BP 0.866 0.868 0.002
CP 0.864 0.864 0.000
DP 0.863 0.865 0.002
EP 0.861 0.861 0.000
FP 0.872 0.872 0.000
GP 0.847 0.841 -0.006
Average P 0.000

AM 1 1 0.000
BM 0.937 0.944 0.007
CM 0.904 0.907 0.003
DM 0.89 0.9 0.010
EM 0.887 0.894 0.007
FM 0.895 0.903 0.008
FSAE 0.946 0.954 0.008
Average M 0.007

F125 0.948 0.957 0.009
FJA 0.855 0.86 0.005
FJB 0.828 0.832 0.004
FJC 0.77 0.778 0.008
Average Kart 0.007

and in order of most change to least:

Figures.... Max jumps ship on STU now that he has to actually run a decent time.

Any second now, we should see Shhhhhhnecker start his belly achin'...

D*mn Rustangs

Jason Isley BS RX8 wrote:Figures.... Max jumps ship on STU now that he has to actually run a decent time.

Thanks, I was stumped trying to figure out a way to insult Max now that he got rid of the STi.

Glenn Duensing wrote:D*mn Rustangs

Yeah, FS is harsh.

Sebastian Rios wrote: Thanks, I was stumped trying to figure out a way to insult Max now that he got rid of the STi.

Oh come on now, I still have a Miata :gpower:

Max Hayter wrote:

Sebastian Rios wrote: Thanks, I was stumped trying to figure out a way to insult Max now that he got rid of the STi.

Oh come on now, I still have a Miata :gpower:

Too easy...

Jason Isley BS RX8 wrote:Figures.... Max jumps ship on STU now that he has to actually run a decent time.

Yeah I noticed that too. STU SHOULD be faster than B-Stock. But alas, the British have scampered away.....

Max Hayter wrote:

Sebastian Rios wrote: Thanks, I was stumped trying to figure out a way to insult Max now that he got rid of the STi.

Oh come on now, I still have a Miata :gpower:

Well AS is just about right now.

If you're going to jump in Curt, now would be a good time.

Giovanni Jaramillo wrote: Yeah I noticed that too. STU SHOULD be faster than B-Stock. But alas, the British have scampered away.....

How do you come up with that theory?!! Mind you, I did beat Isley at the Pro Finale this year:) Also, it makes no sense to me that STU is that much tougher than STX.

Max Hayter wrote:

Giovanni Jaramillo wrote: Yeah I noticed that too. STU SHOULD be faster than B-Stock. But alas, the British have scampered away.....

How do you come up with that theory?!! Mind you, I did beat Isley at the Pro Finale this year:) Also, it makes no sense to me that STU is that much tougher than STX.

STU is SP-lite (without the R-Comps).
Stock is well...Stock.

That's Rick's "theory" (pun CLEARLY intended) in his Racer's Theoretical Performance index and I'm sticking to it

OT: Thanks, Aaron, I've been in .php land today so I'm a wee bit fuzzy headed. HTML was a lot easier. Far more tedious, but easier.

Max Hayter wrote:

Sebastian Rios wrote: Thanks, I was stumped trying to figure out a way to insult Max now that he got rid of the STi.

Oh come on now, I still have a Miata :gpower:

What are you going to compete in for next year now that you've sold the STi?

Giovanni Jaramillo wrote: What are you going to compete in for next year now that you've sold the STi?

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=954" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Max Hayter wrote: Also, it makes no sense to me that STU is that much tougher than STX.

You are insane, it's finaly closer now that's all, the STU PAX has been soft in relation to the rest of the category since it's inception.

Sebastian Rios wrote:

Max Hayter wrote: Also, it makes no sense to me that STU is that much tougher than STX.

You are insane, it's finaly closer now that's all, the STU PAX has been soft in relation to the rest of the category since it's inception.

I dunno sure looks like Mehai's car can run about the same times as Rick's and Max's old car.. sounds like STX should be about the same as STU to me or WRX's should be in STU.

Sebastian Rios wrote: You are insane, it's finaly closer now that's all, the STU PAX has been soft in relation to the rest of the category since it's inception.

You crack smoking desert person - please!!!