Page 1 of 2

December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:10 am
by Marshall Grice
http://scca.com/documents/Fastrack/09/1 ... ck-dec.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:13 am
by Aaron Goldsmith
Wow, marshall keeps the title for a second month in a row!

[*]Sound Measurement Procedures, be made mandatory at all National Solo events in 2010, including the Solo National Championships in Lincoln, with a specified limit of 100 dBA.[/*]

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:16 am
by Marshall Grice
It's a HUGE one this month. One thing of note. Sound control is mandatory at all national events this year with a 100dBA-slow weighting limit.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:37 am
by Jeff Wong
I'm sorry, I haven't looked at a lot of fast tracks but the 'Not Recommended' is denying people's suggestions?

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:39 am
by Marshall Grice
Jeff Wong wrote:I'm sorry, I haven't looked at a lot of fast tracks but the 'Not Recommended' is denying people's suggestions?
yep.

Mike shoots down lots of ST proposals. :lol:

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:58 am
by Rick Brown
Marshall Grice wrote:It's a HUGE one this month. One thing of note. Sound control is mandatory at all national events this year with a 100dBA-slow weighting limit.
Fair warning to all CSCC competitors: We are discussing implementing sound monitoring at all of our events.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:33 pm
by Mako Koiwai
Nice ... I've always wondered how loud those karts and other race vehicles are at CA Speedway

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:55 pm
by Robert Puertas
Toyota Yaris in EP?
Seems like a nice opportunity to add a modern car to GP...
Maybe along with the Smart & Fit?

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:06 pm
by Jason Isley BS RX8
Robert Puertas wrote:Toyota Yaris in EP?
Seems like a nice opportunity to add a modern car to GP...
Maybe along with the Smart & Fit?
And that is what I asked for. :( Late model inexpensive car with a low build cost. In EP the cost to prep the car just jumped by as much as the price of the car. :unimpressed:

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:37 pm
by Rick Brown
Mako Koiwai wrote:Nice ... I've always wondered how loud those karts and other race vehicles are at CA Speedway
Not a big deal for a kart. We have no problem passing in SD. Can be marginal without an airbox (muffles intake noise), but with one it's not an issue. Most of us already have the quiet muffler since there was a popular track that required it. Plus our mufflers have a turn down tip and we can rotate it to what ever direction we want. :D

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:52 pm
by Sebastian Rios
I don't know what slow weighting means, but 100db seems super loud.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:45 pm
by Tom Berry
Sebastian Rios wrote:I don't know what slow weighting means, but 100db seems super loud.
Probably not to Doug Rowse. I'm quite sure is ears are blown out by now. :D

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:49 pm
by Aaron Goldsmith
Sebastian Rios wrote:I don't know what slow weighting means, but 100db seems super loud.
Well.. do you think the larson BMW or the Berry evo are super loud?

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:58 pm
by Marshall Grice
Sebastian Rios wrote:I don't know what slow weighting means, but 100db seems super loud.
slow response means the meter averages the sound over 5 seconds vs 1 sec for fast response.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:10 pm
by Jason Isley BS RX8
Marshall Grice wrote: slow response means the meter averages the sound over 5 seconds vs 1 sec for fast response.
Mine says its a 1 sec average for Slow, and a peak measurement taken for 125 mS on Fast.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:23 pm
by Steve Ekstrand
5 seconds just doesn't seem right. That's an eternity!

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:19 pm
by Marshall Grice
hmm, yeah apparently i'm way off.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:29 pm
by Bob Beamesderfer
I think what Jason's meter has is the standard slow/fast response time.*



*last job I held that had anything to do with audio engineering was 30 years ago.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:25 am
by Sebastian Rios
Aaron Goldsmith wrote:
Sebastian Rios wrote:I don't know what slow weighting means, but 100db seems super loud.
Well.. do you think the larson BMW or the Berry evo are super loud?
No, are they over 100db? I guess I don't understand, at what distance is it measured?

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:38 pm
by Marshall Grice
Sebastian Rios wrote:
Aaron Goldsmith wrote:
Sebastian Rios wrote:I don't know what slow weighting means, but 100db seems super loud.
Well.. do you think the larson BMW or the Berry evo are super loud?
No, are they over 100db? I guess I don't understand, at what distance is it measured?
we're about 96db@50' when measured from the side. about 99db @50' from behind.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:42 pm
by Aaron Goldsmith
Yeah, Toby's car has been at about 105db since the summer. he just threw a full length exhaust back on it for this last event. The full exhaust passes in SD, but most people wouldn't even notice.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:15 pm
by Rad_ Delgado_
My bone stock exhaust was rated at 104dB by Car and Driver magazine. It is street legal, passes DOT limits, California Smog Test, but is not autocross legal according to the new SCCA guidelines.

My Cayman S was measured (using the SCCA method) at 96 dB in San Diego tow months ago, bone stock exhaust system. My former GT3 RS does not pass sound at Laguna Seca, it registers 98 dB on the stock mufflers.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:43 pm
by Art Rinner
I was just informed of this change on page 22:

Very interesting!

ITEM 60) In Appendix A, change in BSP listing:
Datsun
From
240Z & 260Z & 280Z
280ZX non-turbo
280ZX turbo
To:
240Z, 260Z, 280Z, 280ZX, & 280ZX Turbo
SCCA Fastrack News October 2008 Page 45

A 2400 lb Z with a Turbo Motor! Intercooled and new engine management we should get an easy 325 WHP. Just have to figure out the intercooler plumbing without any cutting.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:39 pm
by Eric Clements
Art Rinner wrote: A 2400 lb Z with a Turbo Motor! Intercooled and new engine management we should get an easy 325 WHP. Just have to figure out the intercooler plumbing without any cutting.
I wouldn't put much time/$ into that build just yet, as that's not what I remembered sending to the SEB.

Re: December 2009 fastrack

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:24 pm
by Mike Simanyi
Eric Clements wrote: I wouldn't put much time/$ into that build just yet, as that's not what I remembered sending to the SEB.
Glad to hear that Eric. I don't mind a little creative thinking, but promoting a 39 year old car by listing it on the same line for update/backdate as a late '80s turbocharged car doesn't seem... healthy for the class.

I can't help but wonder how excited 240Z owners are at the prospect of a 2300 lb car with that kind of power, virtually an SSM FrankenZ in BSP livery. Hopefully a correction is listed quickly...

Mike