Page 1 of 1
2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:33 pm
by Ken Motonishi
http://www.scca.com/contingencies.aspx?hub=3" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Very cool, both Toyo and Bridgestone (BS) pay contingency for Divisionals as well.
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:28 pm
by Jonathan Lugod

no Hankook or Dunlop
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:55 pm
by Jason Flores
Your WELCOME!!! now come join us on the Darkside and prove you can bear everyone on anytire!!!!
It would be boring to win on toyos again...thats been done...
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:41 pm
by Ken Motonishi
Sorry, I'm not into the umbrella girl thing. I'd rather have Jon Lugod hold the umbrella for me.

Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:40 am
by Jonathan Lugod
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:42 am
by Steve Ekstrand
Ken Motonishi wrote:Sorry, I'm not into the umbrella girl thing. I'd rather have Jon Lugod hold the umbrella for me.

Whatever you're in to... I don't judge.
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:36 am
by Max Hayter
Anyone have an address to send the W-9 form to?
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:01 am
by Jeff Wong
Jason Flores wrote:
Your WELCOME!!! now come join us on the Darkside and prove you can bear everyone on anytire!!!!
It would be boring to win on toyos again...thats been done...
Come on, Ken wasn't even Top 5. Bill Bounds/Tim Smith hold the bar, you need to think bigger Flores. It's nice to see a shock manufacture is paying contingency!
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:42 am
by Jason Rhoades
When are one of the ST tire manfuacturers going to make a 255/30 or 255/35-17 for all the STR cars to run? Right now Toyo is closest with the 245/35-17, everything 255 in width is at least 25" tall.
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:32 pm
by Ken Motonishi
Hmm, now there's an interesting size: 255/35-17. Has any manufacturer ever made this size for a "street" tire application?
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:30 pm
by Michael Palero
So AST is only paying out for 1st (First) and 5th(Fifth) places... how awesome is that!
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:06 pm
by Jeff Wong
Michael Palero wrote:So AST is only paying out for 1st (First) and 5th(Fifth) places... how awesome is that!
I think it would be more of a challenge to finish 5th then it would be to finish 1st.
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:11 pm
by Michael Palero
Jeff Wong wrote:Michael Palero wrote:So AST is only paying out for 1st (First) and 5th(Fifth) places... how awesome is that!
I think it would be more of a challenge to finish 5th then it would be to finish 1st.
It's so interesting.
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:20 pm
by Steve Ekstrand
5th place? I have a shot.
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:40 pm
by Jonathan Lugod
Steve Ekstrand wrote:5th place? I have a shot.
will you be back in time for the tour? lol you would want to win a certificate ($250) for AST shocks ($1400+)? 2812s not good enough for yah?

Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:54 pm
by Richard Jung
Jonathan Lugod wrote:Steve Ekstrand wrote:5th place? I have a shot.
will you be back in time for the tour? lol you would want to win a certificate ($250) for AST shocks ($1400+)? 2812s not good enough for yah?

Interesting marketing, it might take someone a couple of years to earn a set of shocks. Since it needs to be redeemed in 30 days, you would need to come in 1st to buy 1 shock at a time. Although, the Berry "AST vending machine" could/will win a set of shocks in a weekend.

Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:55 pm
by Steve Ekstrand
Jonathan Lugod wrote:Steve Ekstrand wrote:5th place? I have a shot.
will you be back in time for the tour? lol you would want to win a certificate ($250) for AST shocks ($1400+)? 2812s not good enough for yah?

Don't know if I'll be at the tour or not... Probably.
A set of gabriel hijackers would have been better than most of last year.
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:23 am
by Michael Smith
Max Hayter wrote:Anyone have an address to send the W-9 form to?
"In addition to completing the online registration, submit the W-9 form posted below to the SCCA national office."
SCCA Mailing Address
P.O. Box 19400 Topeka, KS 66619-0400
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:28 pm
by Marshall Grice
Richard Jung wrote:
Interesting marketing, it might take someone a couple of years to earn a set of shocks. Since it needs to be redeemed in 30 days, you would need to come in 1st or 2nd to buy 1 shock at a time. Although, the Berry "AST vending machine" could/will win a set of shocks in a weekend.

well it says you must submit, not redeem, within 30 days. it also says you can't combine certificates, which pretty much eliminates the "ast vending machine" action.
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:51 pm
by Jason Isley BS RX8
Marshall Grice wrote:
well it says you must submit, not redeem, within 30 days. it also says you can't combine certificates, which pretty much eliminates the "ast vending machine" action.
I would imagine the intent is to keep people from selling certificates. Brian is a sharp guy, I am sure in the case of Berry Family racing (or the like) he would do something that was mutually beneficial.
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:56 pm
by Aaron Goldsmith
Jason Isley BS RX8 wrote:Marshall Grice wrote:
well it says you must submit, not redeem, within 30 days. it also says you can't combine certificates, which pretty much eliminates the "ast vending machine" action.
I would imagine the intent is to keep people from selling certificates. Brian is a sharp guy, I am sure in the case of Berry Family racing (or the like) he would do something that was mutually beneficial.
I doubt they'll be swappin Ohlins for AST's anytime soon, but AST does make other stuff. Airjacks anybody?
Re: 2010 SCCA Contingency posted
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:10 pm
by Richard Jung
Aaron Goldsmith wrote:Jason Isley BS RX8 wrote:Marshall Grice wrote:
well it says you must submit, not redeem, within 30 days. it also says you can't combine certificates, which pretty much eliminates the "ast vending machine" action.
I would imagine the intent is to keep people from selling certificates. Brian is a sharp guy, I am sure in the case of Berry Family racing (or the like) he would do something that was mutually beneficial.
I doubt they'll be swappin Ohlins for AST's anytime soon, but AST does make other stuff. Airjacks anybody?
Airjacks would be cool on the FP car, since you have the air hook-up at the motorhome.
