Page 1 of 1
Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:41 am
by Robert Puertas
http://home.comcast.net/~paxrtp/rtp2012.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 8:34 am
by KJ Christopher
Well, mine didn't change....
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 8:40 am
by Eric Clements
EM took a big hit. R1 doesn't look as scary as it was...Presuming ProSolo continues to use the PAX/RTP index
Maybe we can get KJ's index over 1.000

Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 9:12 am
by Leonard Cachola
All the stock classes except for CS took a hit.
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 9:55 am
by Doug Kott
For ST classes, looks like it's slightly more favorable for STR and STX, less favorable for STS and the same for those pesky ST(C) Civics!

Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 10:10 am
by George Schilling
Leonard Cachola wrote:All the stock classes except for CS took a hit.
Which is absolutely nuts! Who paid who?
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 10:16 am
by Aaron Goldsmith
CSP and SM look to be a couple of the big winners. I updated my graphs:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub ... utput=html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'd say SMF too.. but no one is a winner when they are driving an SMF car.
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:12 am
by Max Hayter
Here is a quick comparison between 2011 and 2012.
2012 2011 Change
SS 0.858 SS 0.857 0.001
AS 0.844 AS 0.841 0.003
BS 0.843 BS 0.839 0.004
CS 0.833 CS 0.833 0
DS 0.821 DS 0.817 0.004
ES 0.828 ES 0.825 0.003
FS 0.825 FS 0.827 -0.002
GS 0.814 GS 0.809 0.005
HS 0.799 HS 0.791 0.008
SSP 0.865
ASP 0.863 ASP 0.862 0.001
BSP 0.859 BSP 0.859 0
CSP 0.857 CSP 0.858 -0.001
DSP 0.851 DSP 0.844 0.007
ESP 0.848 ESP 0.846 0.002
FSP 0.838 FSP 0.835 0.003
STF 0.787
STC 0.82 ST 0.82 0
STS 0.827 STS 0.823 0.004
STR 0.835 STR 0.836 -0.001
STX 0.822 STX 0.824 -0.002
STU 0.841 STU 0.838 0.003
XP 0.898 XP 0.887 0.011
BP 0.873 BP 0.87 0.003
CP 0.86 CP 0.86 0
DP 0.868 DP 0.867 0.001
EP 0.87 EP 0.863 0.007
FP 0.875 FP 0.872 0.003
GP 0.85 GP 0.837 0.013
SM 0.866 SM 0.869 -0.003
SMF 0.852 SMF 0.855 -0.003
SSM 0.879 SSM 0.875 0.004
AM 1 AM 1 0
BM 0.96 BM 0.958 0.002
CM 0.906 CM 0.906 0
DM 0.915 DM 0.905 0.01
EM 0.928 EM 0.91 0.018
FM 0.913 FM 0.904 0.009
FSAE 0.989 FSAE 0.981 0.008
F125 0.952 F125 0.952 0
JA 0.876 FJA 0.866 0.01
JB 0.834 FJB 0.826 0.008
JC 0.747 FJC 0.755 -0.008
Average Change = 0.003170732
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:26 pm
by Kurt Rahn
Leonard Cachola wrote:All the stock classes except for CS took a hit.
Wonderful. Like you guys needed that.

:barf:
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:45 pm
by Ed Holley
Leonard Cachola wrote:All the stock classes except for CS took a hit.
Actually, FS's index went the other way, unless it's a misprint. Ya, those Mustangs are really slow.
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:19 pm
by Leonard Cachola
Ed Holley wrote:Leonard Cachola wrote:All the stock classes except for CS took a hit.
Actually, FS's index went the other way, unless it's a misprint. Ya, those Mustangs are really slow.
Yeah, but FS doesn't affect SK2.
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:53 pm
by Max Hayter
Apparently, putting Brian Peters and Mark Daddio in FS makes it slower }:)
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:15 pm
by Tom Berry
ASP 0.863 ASP 0.862 0.001
BSP 0.859 BSP 0.859 0
NIce try on this on Max. Did you forget that last year's BSP ( well, most of it ) is the new ASP ?
Looks like we got hit with a plus 4
And CSP got easier??? yikes!
Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:17 pm
by Tom Berry
I'd say SMF too.. but no one is a winner when they are driving an SMF car.[/quote]
Too funny!

Re: Updated 2012 PAX Index
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:49 am
by Steve Abbott
I guess they found out that I've been working on my car lately. I got hit with 11. I should have never taken out that carpet. What a joke.
Steve A.