Not Just SUV's ... Fiat 500 Also
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:06 am
http://www.sccabb.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10778&TPN=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Karl loves his Euro Abarth
Karl loves his Euro Abarth
I hope you didn't just buy one.Leonard Cachola wrote:Did not know this.
But they seem to drive on two wheels in Lebanon anyway ... maybe that's what Karl meant by "way fun?!"I bought an Abarth "Esseesse", which is an Abarth 500 with an upgraded kit (suspension, filter, exhaust, seats) to make it to 170hp.
It might be close to the one sold in the US, I don't know. the US one might be heavier, I have no idea. Mine is pretty quick and nimble, the 0-60 times I don't really care about though, but they are in the 6 secs range.
The handling is way fun, though. And the car is a perfect fit for the tight streets of Beirut, too.
lol, no, but we did have one at the school last year.George Schilling wrote:I hope you didn't just buy one.Leonard Cachola wrote:Did not know this.
Looks like it has it's cap on backward, weighs more than the hardtop and sacrifices valuable headroom and the back seats (not that those get much use in my car anyway). And yes, it looks like they sequestered three designers in different rooms and told them to design a part of the car without allowing communication with the other designers.Doug Kott wrote:Can we ban the Mini Coupe strictly on the basis of sheer ugliness?![]()
Not that popular so far, it's a sales flop.Sebastian Rios wrote:Yeah, kind of a bummer, seems to be a popular car. I'm not positive, but I think in this case SCCA is not letting it run at all, rather than just banning it from Stock category like some other models with rollover potential.
I instructed the gentleman that came in the Fiat at the school. The car handle pretty good. In fact, it had the second fastest time through the slalom. Only losing to Pete Loney in his S2000 by just a hair. I was quite surprised.Leonard Cachola wrote:lol, no, but we did have one at the school last year.George Schilling wrote:I hope you didn't just buy one.Leonard Cachola wrote:Did not know this.
Sizes Matters ... ;)The car handle pretty good. In fact, it had the second fastest time through the slalom
Well of course ... everyone is waiting to see if the SCCA will classify it!Not that popular so far, it's a sales flop.
I blame Jennifer Lopez, she ruined that car for me.Bob Beamesderfer wrote: Not that popular so far, it's a sales flop.
...But didn't the Abarth ad bring you back?Mike Shin wrote:I blame Jennifer Lopez, she ruined that car for me.Bob Beamesderfer wrote: Not that popular so far, it's a sales flop.
The hot Italian woman yelling angrily was awesome. But when I saw the car again, even in the Abarth trim, I was hit with flashbacks of Gucci edition pin stripes, random hip-hop dance numbers in the street and "Jenny from da block". Whatever that means.Bill Schenker wrote:
...But didn't the Abarth ad bring you back?
Its all just lies upon lies... First they get caught faking the location for the Jlo ads, then the angry hot chick is not even Italian.Mike Shin wrote:
The hot Italian woman yelling angrily was awesome. But when I saw the car again, even in the Abarth trim, I was hit with flashbacks of Gucci edition pin stripes, random hip-hop dance numbers in the street and "Jenny from da block". Whatever that means.
My head just exploded.Jason Isley BS RX8 wrote: Its all just lies upon lies... First they get caught faking the location for the Jlo ads, then the angry hot chick is not even Italian.Next everyone will discover it is really a Mexican import via Detroit.
Oh the shame.
Fiat, winning:Mike Shin wrote:My head just exploded.Jason Isley BS RX8 wrote: Its all just lies upon lies... First they get caught faking the location for the Jlo ads, then the angry hot chick is not even Italian.Next everyone will discover it is really a Mexican import via Detroit.
Oh the shame.
Everyone I see driving one I ask if they bought it because of the J-Lo endorsement. The embrassment in their eyes is grand.Mike Shin wrote:I blame Jennifer Lopez, she ruined that car for me.
John, it is more a matter of the data no longer being available. The previously accepted SSF calculation which served for years is no longer given. Calculating wouldn't be a problem, except the needed data is limited and conflicting (depending on source). So, the default has to be conservative: height vs. average track width...if it taller than it is wide, all other things being equal, it represents greater rollover risk.John Coffey wrote:SCCA's roll over criteria is outdated.