Page 1 of 1
Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 3:31 pm
by Craig Naylor
Question... the #1 seed should be the person with the best win over class while the 32nd seed should be the last one who got in by the hair on their teeth, correct?
Ladies classes must have been skimpy. Only 4 made it into the challenge.
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:18 pm
by Jayson Woodruff
That's how I understand it, but you run out of winners well before you get to #32 and start taking close non-winners. Should be spelled out in the Sup Regs though. With that 'seeding' the high seeds (1,2,3) should be facing non-class winners, who in theory are indexed beyond their ability.
Jay W
Craig Naylor wrote:Question... the #1 seed should be the person with the best win over class while the 32nd seed should be the last one who got in by the hair on their teeth, correct?
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:31 pm
by Craig Naylor
That's what I though, and then surmised after looking at the rules. But... then I was confused based upon the results posted on SCCA.com for the event.
The reason I was asking was based upon the results in STS. The class winner (Andrew Hahn) was ranked 31st, while the 2nd place (David Whitener) was ranked #6, for the Super Challenge, and I found that odd.
So either the results for the Super Challenge are wrong, or the results for the class are wrong.
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:48 pm
by Jayson Woodruff
I think the numbers for the bracket are upside down, but it's in the right order. Try from top to bottom:
1
32
16
17
8
25
9
24
4
29
13
20
5
28
12
21
2
31
15
18
7
26
10
23
3
30
14
19
6
27
11
22
Seems to make more sence.
Jay W
Craig Naylor wrote:That's what I though, and then surmised after looking at the rules. But... then I was confused based upon the results posted on SCCA.com for the event.
The reason I was asking was based upon the results in STS. The class winner (Andrew Hahn) was ranked 31st, while the 2nd place (David Whitener) was ranked #6, for the Super Challenge, and I found that odd.
So either the results for the Super Challenge are wrong, or the results for the class are wrong.
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:34 am
by Christine Grice
Jayson Woodruff wrote:I think the numbers for the bracket are upside down, but it's in the right order. Try from top to bottom:
...
Seems to make more sence.
Jay W
This matches what the Nationals Staff was talking about at El Toro. They felt that it was actually a detriment to the top qualifier to run last in the first round. If the top qualifier makes it to the final round, it gives the first run off pairing more time to cool down.
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:32 pm
by Craig Naylor
Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 6:46 pm
by Rick Brown
Why don't you just email Howard?
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:06 pm
by KJ Christopher
Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Are Andrew and David still driving the same car?
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:27 am
by Craig Naylor
Rick Brown wrote:Why don't you just email Howard?
What kind of workbench racing would that be?

Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:31 am
by Craig Naylor
KJ Christopher wrote:Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Are Andrew and David still driving the same car?
So many ways that could be answered.
Yes - They co drove
Maybe - The photo's look like the same car, but I guess a new "car" with the same paint job could have replaced the prior one.
Not for long - If Andrew keeps beating David the car owner. }:)
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:11 am
by Pete Loney
Craig Naylor wrote:KJ Christopher wrote:Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
Are Andrew and David still driving the same car?
So many ways that could be answered.
Yes - They co drove
Maybe - The photo's look like the same car, but I guess a new "car" with the same paint job could have replaced the prior one.
Not for long - If Andrew keeps beating David the car owner. }:)
Partially a new Car, they were running Rivals!
Re: Minerel Wells Pro Solo
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:10 am
by Jayson Woodruff
Craig Naylor wrote:Jay that still would not work.
Based upon your groupings that would put STS winner (Andrew) in 12 qualifying spot, and STS 2nd place (David) in 9th qualifying spot.
I see David in 17th seed under 'my' schedule.
Jay W