STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

General discussions about Solo

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

User avatar
George Schilling
Club Representative
Posts: 5136
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 66
Location: Lakewood, CA

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by George Schilling »

FYI Curt, there's a 2003 S2K that I just saw for under $10K with a hardtop. It has a salvage title but looks pretty good in the pics. I believe it was on Auto Trader. I have plenty of stock wheels if you need a set.
CASOC Autocross Club, 1984 Van Diemen RF-84, 1600cc Kent, Hewland Mk9, Centerline 2 pc. wheels, Hoosier R25B, SuperTrapp, Zimmer Alloclassic titanium left hip w/Metasul LDH chromium-cobalt lg dia head
User avatar
Curt Luther
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 9
Location: Lookin' in Mike's cooler for "water" ;)...and my underwear
Contact:

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Curt Luther »

George Schilling wrote:FYI Curt, there's a 2003 S2K that I just saw for under $10K with a hardtop. It has a salvage title but looks pretty good in the pics. I believe it was on Auto Trader. I have plenty of stock wheels if you need a set.
You mean this one:

http://tinyurl.com/o8e895" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Not that I've been looking or anything...

...but you know I prefer white chicks...

...and I really want an AP2...
Rev. Dr. Curtis J. Luther, Esq., M.D.
User avatar
Steve Ekstrand
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 7482
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 15
Location: This space left intentionally blank
Contact:

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Steve Ekstrand »

Both of these cars suck....

Luther how do you bang the supermodel in the backseat?
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
User avatar
George Schilling
Club Representative
Posts: 5136
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 66
Location: Lakewood, CA

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by George Schilling »

Curt Luther wrote:
George Schilling wrote:FYI Curt, there's a 2003 S2K that I just saw for under $10K with a hardtop. It has a salvage title but looks pretty good in the pics. I believe it was on Auto Trader. I have plenty of stock wheels if you need a set.
You mean this one:

http://tinyurl.com/o8e895" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Not that I've been looking or anything...

...but you know I prefer white chicks...

...and I really want an AP2...
That's the one. Looks like it's a good deal. The hard top alone is worth $2K. $8K for a 2003 if it's as clean as it looks might be worth considering.
CASOC Autocross Club, 1984 Van Diemen RF-84, 1600cc Kent, Hewland Mk9, Centerline 2 pc. wheels, Hoosier R25B, SuperTrapp, Zimmer Alloclassic titanium left hip w/Metasul LDH chromium-cobalt lg dia head
User avatar
Kurt Rahn
Posts: 3923
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 88
Location: Pasadena

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Kurt Rahn »

Curt Luther wrote:...but you know I prefer white chicks...
If you like plumper white chicks, I know one that'll be available soon :lol:
==============
Oversteer is better than understeer because you don't see the tree you're hitting.
User avatar
James Yom
Current Solo Director
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Car#: 28

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by James Yom »

Curt Luther wrote:
I think that's where some people are getting, for lack of a better word, confused. They see the car Brian built doing better than the car Jason built and seeing that Brian's car looked more stock and they say, "See, it's gotta be faster in ST trim too". An NA Miata is way faster in CSP trim than a Civic or CRX in the same trim. By the same arguement for the MX-5 and S2000 above, the Miata should be faster than the CRX in STS, but, at this point, it's not...

Yes, the lighter car on street tires does have the advantage, theoretically. That being said Rhoades did quite well a couple of years ago bucking this trend. So there is precident that it can be done...
I'd be careful arguing WHY a NA Miata is faster than a CRX under SP rules. If you understand why the Miatas are faster, you'll see that it acutally goes against your argument.

As for Jason U vs. Brian's cars, Jason's car barely (if at all) has the advantage, and that's with the sticky R-comps and ridiculously wide rubber/wheels (295s on 11 inch wide wheels!). Safe to say that Uyeda's car can put all his power down. Even if tire and wheel width were unlimited in STR, the NC is gonna be a lot faster on street tires, and then limit it to 255/265s on 9 inches, the S2000 has no chance.

Using J-Rho's well deserved win at Nationals isn't a good argument either. First, one of the keys to his victory was using the sticky Yoks that were unavailable to the Spec Civics. And let's not forget, Jason Frank was DSQed, but his times were pretty valid (ok, let's add .1 sec for the 5 pounds of undercoat), and was quite a bit faster than J-Rho. But J-Rho crossed his Ts and dotted his i-s, and was rightfully the National Champ. Tire choice is the same for both the S2k and NC, so that is a mute point.
Darren Cole wrote:
James,
What benefits do the 2006+ S2000 have over the 2004 and 2005?

Where you been? did you move again? S2000 crowd is getting bigger than ever!
The 06+ S2000s have the reflashable ECUs, so it's the easiest to extract any gains that you'd get from I/H/E, and you can easily raise the rev-limiter, which is one of the crutches of running an AP2 in AS. There is one other piggy back solution for the older AP2s, but you'd need to know someone that knew what he was doing. Then there is the really ghetto way of raising the rev limiter.

I should have been more specific though, key is the 08+ S2000. Why? The ability to easily transform it into the CR, and get the weight savings, with the 2.2L motor and ECU.

I'm in Korea right now and will be here til 2010, then HOPEFULLY back to SoCal...

James
User avatar
Will Kalman
Posts: 1210
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 232

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Will Kalman »

James Yom wrote:so that is a mute point.
No, this is:
;)
Aaron Goldsmith
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 4:22 pm
Club: CASOC
Car#: 32
Location: HB, CA

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Aaron Goldsmith »

Will Kalman wrote:
James Yom wrote:so that is a mute point.
No, this is:
;)
Eggcorns are the best, haha.

http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/english/41/mute/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
James Yom
Current Solo Director
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Car#: 28

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by James Yom »

Image

ah so, one tao-send aporrowgees

me no speaky engrish berry guuuuuud.
User avatar
Ken Motonishi
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: GRA
Car#: 491
Location: Paekche Kingdom

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Ken Motonishi »

Image

Here you go James. Come drive it.
Dood, are you gonna eat that?
Jason Uyeda
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Jason Uyeda »

Ken Motonishi wrote:Image

Here you go James. Come drive it.

That car won't be STR legal :)
User avatar
Ken Motonishi
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: GRA
Car#: 491
Location: Paekche Kingdom

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Ken Motonishi »

you mean we can't run 10" wheels? :mrt:

Maybe the STAC will realize S2000s need more than anemic 8.5" and 245s
Dood, are you gonna eat that?
Jason Uyeda
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Jason Uyeda »

Ken Motonishi wrote:you mean we can't run 10" wheels? :mrt:

Maybe the STAC will realize S2000s need more than anemic 8.5" and 245s
Haha, you don't know what size those wheels are do you? I don't think the fronts or rears will be legal for STR when the final rules come out, even if they allow 9s...

Did you write a letter?
User avatar
Jason Isley BS RX8
Posts: 1129
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Car#: 0
Location: Coto de Caza
Contact:

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Jason Isley BS RX8 »

The sad part is Kenny only has two of those wheels, the other side is sporting econo spares. :lol:
Ken Motonishi wrote:Image

Here you go James. Come drive it.
User avatar
Ken Motonishi
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: GRA
Car#: 491
Location: Paekche Kingdom

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Ken Motonishi »

Yes...I realize that. I remeasured the wheels the other day to make sure they haven't changed in dimension. Hopefully 9s are allowed. Emilio is going to make some nice 17x9 wheels- the 6ULR- with a +63 offset soon just for the S2000.
Dood, are you gonna eat that?
User avatar
Mike Simanyi
Former Club Chair
Posts: 2460
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: No$
Car#: 6

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Mike Simanyi »

Ken Motonishi wrote:you mean we can't run 10" wheels? :mrt:

Maybe the STAC will realize S2000s need more than anemic 8.5" and 245s
I doubt it. Those guys are chuckleheads.
User avatar
Steve Ekstrand
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 7482
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 15
Location: This space left intentionally blank
Contact:

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Steve Ekstrand »

Jason Isley BS RX8 wrote:The sad part is Kenny only has two of those wheels, the other side is sporting econo spares. :lol:

Maybe Kenny can average the widths.... Then hope for a clockwise oval?
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
User avatar
Sebastian Rios
King of Fastrack!
Posts: 1656
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 397
Location: Out to lunch

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Sebastian Rios »

Mike Simanyi wrote: Maybe the STAC will realize S2000s need more than anemic 8.5" and 245s
I doubt it. Those guys are chuckleheads.[/quote]

Definitely chuckleheads...I heard one guy would like to see CARB parts on all ST* cars! :x :unimpressed:
Jonathan Lugod
King of Fastrack!
Posts: 966
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 194
Location: Oceanside

Re: STR: S2000 vrs MX-5 thoughts?

Post by Jonathan Lugod »

Sebastian Rios wrote:
Mike Simanyi wrote: Maybe the STAC will realize S2000s need more than anemic 8.5" and 245s
I doubt it. Those guys are chuckleheads.
Definitely chuckleheads...I heard one guy would like to see CARB parts on all ST* cars! :x :unimpressed:[/quote]

cool... It'll give Injen, AEM, and DC Sports money since everyone else uses ebay performance parts or Super expensive ones that give the uber-power ;) :D
http://www.osgiken.net
4 BSP- 2019 Mazda ND Miata - 2001 SSM Honda S2000
OS Giken / Bride / ShaftWorks USA
Post Reply