I'm fully a Data Cracquisition addict now.

Moderator: Mike Simanyi
Look in the Casoc Event thread, marshall has a touch of thier data. DL1 data is MaxQ data on steroids, you get hotness like, individual wheelspeeds, throttle and steering possition, etc.Jason Flores wrote:lets see some screen shots of the data output....ive never seen the data from a DL1 is it anything like the MAXQ?
You might want to talk to marshall about brake pressure sensors before you spend a lot of time working on one...Jason Flores wrote:I'm actually working on a light that works on a pressure system that will get brighter as u apply more pressure...but it is going to have to be specifically built for our pedal system since the current sensor is on/off the new sensor would have to be stepped so that maybe you could measure 4 levels of braking...I have some for RPM now so the lights get brighter and brighter till its time to shift but that just for fun...
yeah we had brake pressure sensors on the formula car. by and by it was pretty boring data. you could write a math function to calculate brake pressure based on longitudinal accel. in general you don't really care about how much psi you're generating so much as how fast you're slowing down. infact a speed plot is much more valuable for analysing braking performance.Aaron Goldsmith wrote:You might want to talk to marshall about brake pressure sensors before you spend a lot of time working on one...Jason Flores wrote:I'm actually working on a light that works on a pressure system that will get brighter as u apply more pressure...but it is going to have to be specifically built for our pedal system since the current sensor is on/off the new sensor would have to be stepped so that maybe you could measure 4 levels of braking...I have some for RPM now so the lights get brighter and brighter till its time to shift but that just for fun...
end result, turns out.. not worth the time
Steve's looking to see if he's inadvertantly left-foot braking. Maybe he could determine it if he had TPS wired in and looked at the long accel data but it will be difficult to determine if he's taking 5 or 10 hp out by dragging the brakes. If not brake pressure, a brake flag that tripped further down the pedal stroke would be helpful, as he stated.Marshall Grice wrote: yeah we had brake pressure sensors on the formula car. by and by it was pretty boring data. you could write a math function to calculate brake pressure based on longitudinal accel. in general you don't really care about how much psi you're generating so much as how fast you're slowing down. infact a speed plot is much more valuable for analysing braking performance.
well take your foot off the brakeSteve Ekstrand wrote:The reason for brake pressure on me is mainly because of me....
The brake goes on a lot when I'm driving. Often with the throttle position is 100%.
I've always done it. You do it in drag racing, you do it in stunt driving. You do it when you're scaring yourself on an autocross course. So, people chicken lift. I ride the brake.
If you drove properly I don't think it would matter much. But I'm addicted to the brake pedal. So, I'm wondering if watching a few laps of data acq with the brake on all the time will shame my subconscious enough to help break me of this bad habit.
yeah but you also need to figure out where to shift. i find it hard to believe that 2nd gear was faster for you guys on this last course.Max Hayter wrote:I find Data Acq. to be much more useful now that I have Aaron to interpret the data!![]()
One of the main things we use it for during an event is to determine whether to use 3rd gear. For instance, on my first run on Sunday, I went to 3rd twice and we then looked at the data to see the terminal speed I reached when i did that. It showed that by the time I shifted, I got no faster than just banging away on the limiter in 2nd!
Conversely, at the San Fran Divisional, it shows that going to 3rd was totally worth it.
That's what is really holding me back, I've used the max Q software before, but I couldn't really figure it out. So I just ended up watching the lines chase each other around the course.Max Hayter wrote:I find Data Acq. to be much more useful now that I have Aaron to interpret the data!![]()
The 2 downhill sections were the parts where he shifted to 3rd.. first downhill was boarderline worth it.. second one he went 2 miles per hour slower.Marshall Grice wrote: i'd guess that going up hill, rev limiter in 2nd is faster but doing down hill 3rd would be faster then 2nd. what's your topspeed in 3rd?
Aaron Goldsmith wrote:The 2 downhill sections were the parts where he shifted to 3rd.. first downhill was boarderline worth it.. second one he went 2 miles per hour slower.Marshall Grice wrote: i'd guess that going up hill, rev limiter in 2nd is faster but doing down hill 3rd would be faster then 2nd. what's your topspeed in 3rd?
Is 100bar enough? I'd think you'd want closer to 250 (depending on where you mount the sensors).Marshall Grice wrote:btw, I still have the brake pressure sensor. it reads up to like 100bar or something stupid like that. i might be interested in selling it.
55.07mph top speed coming downhill toward the finish in the SK2/HS Civic. The chart shows the rest...Jason Flores wrote:what was everyones top speed on the downhills and the uphills on sunday....ill post mine in a few hours when i get home...but it would be interesting to know
exactly like this http://www.aim-sportline.com./download/ ... 00_eng.pdfJason Uyeda wrote:Is 100bar enough? I'd think you'd want closer to 250 (depending on where you mount the sensors).Marshall Grice wrote:btw, I still have the brake pressure sensor. it reads up to like 100bar or something stupid like that. i might be interested in selling it.
Marshall, you have something like this:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Pressure-Transduc ... m153.l1262
Or something nicer?
2 second rule - If you're on the limiter for 2 seconds, and can go to third and straight back to WOT (and maintain WOT for the rest of the 2 sec sector), 3rd will be faster by at least a tenth if not a couple tenths (for a reasonably powerful car like an STU STi). Assuming you can shift reasonably well.Marshall Grice wrote:Aaron Goldsmith wrote:The 2 downhill sections were the parts where he shifted to 3rd.. first downhill was boarderline worth it.. second one he went 2 miles per hour slower.Marshall Grice wrote: i'd guess that going up hill, rev limiter in 2nd is faster but doing down hill 3rd would be faster then 2nd. what's your topspeed in 3rd?
2mph slower where? the video show him on the revlimiter for like 30seconds of a 60sec course. i gotta imagine 3rd is faster somewhere. what's the topspeed of 3rd?