Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
Moderator: Mike Simanyi
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
- Club: PSCC
- Car#: 512
Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
B. The course shall be at least 15 feet wide, and single-file slalom
markers shall be at least 45 feet apart. Any series of course
markers which are generally in a line and have the effect of a
slalom are considered to be a slalom. Additional course markers
associated with the slalom markers to form gates, “boxes”, etc.,
do not cancel this limit.
I have been to the National Championships 3 times so far, and my perception is that courses (even at Heartland Park) are wide open. There are some guidelines for course design documented in the SCCA Solo rules.
Last weekend course felt very narrow, especially for a facility like El Toro (gigantic grippy tarmac and no poles).
Is rule 2.3.B just for Nationals, or does it apply to National Tours, Pros, Divisionals, or even the local events?
markers shall be at least 45 feet apart. Any series of course
markers which are generally in a line and have the effect of a
slalom are considered to be a slalom. Additional course markers
associated with the slalom markers to form gates, “boxes”, etc.,
do not cancel this limit.
I have been to the National Championships 3 times so far, and my perception is that courses (even at Heartland Park) are wide open. There are some guidelines for course design documented in the SCCA Solo rules.
Last weekend course felt very narrow, especially for a facility like El Toro (gigantic grippy tarmac and no poles).
Is rule 2.3.B just for Nationals, or does it apply to National Tours, Pros, Divisionals, or even the local events?
- Mike Simanyi
- Former Club Chair
- Posts: 2460
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: No$
- Car#: 6
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
That applies to all courses run under SCCA sanction.
The course we ran last weekend was fully compliant Rad. If you ever have the misfortune to drive a 45' spaced slalom, you'll know the definition of "tight."
If I had to drive 45' slaloms repeatedly, I'd take up a different hobby.
Mike
The course we ran last weekend was fully compliant Rad. If you ever have the misfortune to drive a 45' spaced slalom, you'll know the definition of "tight."
If I had to drive 45' slaloms repeatedly, I'd take up a different hobby.
Mike
- George Schilling
- Club Representative
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: CASOC
- Car#: 66
- Location: Lakewood, CA
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
AmenMike Simanyi wrote:If you ever have the misfortune to drive a 45' spaced slalom, you'll know the definition of "tight."
If I had to drive 45' slaloms repeatedly, I'd take up a different hobby.
Mike
CASOC Autocross Club, 1984 Van Diemen RF-84, 1600cc Kent, Hewland Mk9, Centerline 2 pc. wheels, Hoosier R25B, SuperTrapp, Zimmer Alloclassic titanium left hip w/Metasul LDH chromium-cobalt lg dia head
- Michael Palero
- King of Fastrack!
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
- Club: SCNAX
- Car#: 18
- Location: San Gabriel Valley & Long Beach
- Contact:
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
According to Brian Robertson, there are Solo competitors with calibrated eyes that know right away and will make a stink when that 45' minimum isn't met.
Those folks were in attendance this past event.
Those folks were in attendance this past event.
- Christine Grice
- King of Fastrack!
- Posts: 1935
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: CASOC
- Car#: 17
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
2.3.B is not listed.1.1 MANDATORY PROVISIONS
Sections 1 (all), 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.3 (except 3.3.3.A), 3.6, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, and 5.11 are mandatory in all Solo Events that a Region solely or jointly organizes, conducts, sanctions or otherwise cooperates as a Region in organizing. The titles of mandatory sections are underlined herein. At events where kart classes (F125, FJ) are offered, Sections 2.7 and 2.8 are mandatory. Vehicle classifi cations are not mandatory. Regions should use classing structures which are best for the development of their programs. However, Regions may not allow faster karts per age group than those already described in Section 19. National vehicle classifi cations are located in Appendix A of these rules. Suggested optional classes and rules are located in Appendixes A, G, and H. The entire Solo Rules are mandatory for Divisional and National Solo events. Additional rules governing the ProSolo National Series are in Section 20 of these rules.
Either way, it didn't seem like the course I drove Saturday violated these guidelines.
~Christine Grice
2006 Mitsubishi Evolution, Berry Family Racing/Hoosier/ChaseCam
2006 Mitsubishi Evolution, Berry Family Racing/Hoosier/ChaseCam
- Marshall Grice
- Former CSCC Overall Champion
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
- Club: CASOC
- Car#: 11
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
if it felt tight you were probably driving it wrong... }:)
- Keith Brown
- King of Fastrack!
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Car#: 96
- Location: Seattle
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
Christine Berry wrote: 2.3.B is not listed.
If 2.3 were mandatory, many regions would not be able to hold events. Small lots with light poles and curbs...
Keith
1990 Miata with the really big roll bar
http://www.chaserace.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.tightntidyracing.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.vorschlag.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.ast-usa.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
1990 Miata with the really big roll bar
http://www.chaserace.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.tightntidyracing.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.vorschlag.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.ast-usa.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Steve Ekstrand
- Solo Safety Steward
- Posts: 7482
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: CASOC
- Car#: 15
- Location: This space left intentionally blank
- Contact:
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
The kids course I did was 45ft slalom spacing and 15ft opening on the lane changes and chicago box.....
Painful. Wouldn't want to drive it in a car. But the kids seemed to have fun.
We've been trying to force them into proper lines and back siding key cones, or there is no way they can make it through. Teaching by natural selection.
Painful. Wouldn't want to drive it in a car. But the kids seemed to have fun.
We've been trying to force them into proper lines and back siding key cones, or there is no way they can make it through. Teaching by natural selection.
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
- Club: PSCC
- Car#: 512
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
I agree, entirely. I have never hit so many cones in one lap. The most I ever hit was a finish at a National Tour in Massachusetts, crossed sideways in my 996 GT3 trying to catch that fast "Junior Johnson" Elise time with my slightly modified 996 GT3. I hit 6 cones and gave a re-run to my co-driver's closest competitor, and he took my co-driver out of trophies. My co-driver and I are still close friends.Marshall Grice wrote:if it felt tight you were probably driving it wrong... }:)
However, that one time I knew I hit many cones, but this Sunday I hit 50% more cones (9, nine!!! ) and I don't even know where I hit them, or what hit them, except 2 of them, I kept looking for cone marks around the car. I need to practice a lot more, and/or run one of those mini-size cars very popular these days in ST classes.
- Bill Martin
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: GRA
- Car#: 74
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
I'm sure I had one of the widest cars out there and I didn't find it narrow, except perhaps for the awkward start, which certainly felt narrow. It's clear however it was not a typical course given the excessive pylons hit and DNF's. I wouldn't look forward to this becoming the norm for events, but as a one-off...what they say about variety.Rad_ Delgado_ wrote: Last weekend course felt very narrow, especially for a facility like El Toro (gigantic grippy tarmac and no poles).
- Craig Naylor
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
- Club: SCNAX
- Car#: 80
- Location: Long Beach
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
I'll agree the course was legal, but on the other issue...Christine Berry wrote:2.3.B is not listed.1.1 MANDATORY PROVISIONS
Sections 1 (all), 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.3 (except 3.3.3.A), 3.6, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, and 5.11 are mandatory in all Solo Events that a Region solely or jointly organizes, conducts, sanctions or otherwise cooperates as a Region in organizing. The titles of mandatory sections are underlined herein. At events where kart classes (F125, FJ) are offered, Sections 2.7 and 2.8 are mandatory. Vehicle classifi cations are not mandatory. Regions should use classing structures which are best for the development of their programs. However, Regions may not allow faster karts per age group than those already described in Section 19. National vehicle classifi cations are located in Appendix A of these rules. Suggested optional classes and rules are located in Appendixes A, G, and H. The entire Solo Rules are mandatory for Divisional and National Solo events. Additional rules governing the ProSolo National Series are in Section 20 of these rules.
Either way, it didn't seem like the course I drove Saturday violated these guidelines.
While it may not be mandatory by National Rules, it is for our region as our sub Regs state we include all rules in the rulebook.
- Jayson Woodruff
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: PSCC
- Car#: 51
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
Well you hit 7 of them in my section one run through. Can't believe you didn't feel the last two on the chart, as one was punched and the other was a batch.Rad_ Delgado_ wrote:However, that one time I knew I hit many cones, but this Sunday I hit 50% more cones (9, nine!!! ) and I don't even know where I hit them, or what hit them, except 2 of them, I kept looking for cone marks around the car. I need to practice a lot more, and/or run one of those mini-size cars very popular these days in ST classes.
Jay W
- Attachments
-
- Rads Romp
- rad.JPG (31.24 KiB) Viewed 5755 times
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
I personally am thankful for courses like the one we saw last event. I like many other people hit cones and even had a DNF, which is very rare on competition days and my standing suffered from sub par driving. But this course was the most fun challenging course I have driven in a long time. It had a great balance between tight and technical, and open and fast. Some turns were hard to judge but my car and I never felt awkward going through any section of the course. If it weren't for courses like this one that challenge me on so many different levels, I would never improve as a driver. And what a perfect course right before the next two events, they can throw anything at me now and I will be prepared.
-
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
- Club: PSCC
- Car#: 908
- Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Re: Rule 2.3.B: Course Design Rules (SCCA Solo Rules)
^ Great... I'm screwed!


