GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

General discussions about Solo

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

Post Reply
User avatar
Jeff Wong
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 146

GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

Post by Jeff Wong »

http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/5549/imagetlx.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/3622/image0001s.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Time to get some SSR's! :lol: :roll:

"Finally, we wanted to evaluate our changes every step of the way. A lot of people tend to follow prevailing wisdom or assumption to throw a bunch of parts at a car. We want to know just how much each components or changes helps-or hurts-our march toward success. With the help of our partners at Tire Rack and their test track we will do our best to measure the effects of every tweak." - John Rogers GRM October 2010

I'm amazed that the 'hot setup' was not examined further. I'd be interested to see how the results would have ended up with the TRMotorsports C3 + 245/40/17 Dunlops. Also I wonder if the 3mm in offset difference would have made a difference.

Kosei K1 TS 17x9: 45mm Offset
TRMotorsports C3 17x9: 48mm Offset

/Discuss
Jeff Wong
1994 Honda Civic- STS
ProParts USA
Like Us on Facebook
User avatar
Q V
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 1398
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 69
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

Post by Q V »

I like the ad on the side "make 'er scream with parts you can trust", lol, GENIUS!

Yea, way too many combinations going on.

I would also like to see 255/40 on the Kosei's and/or if 245/40 is still the best, try it w/ full tread, 6/10, 4/10. O the possibilities.

QV
- going back to taking a bunch of old parts off & throwing a bunch of new parts at his car while screaming "go faster!"
Jonathan Lugod
King of Fastrack!
Posts: 966
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 194
Location: Oceanside

Re: GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

Post by Jonathan Lugod »

Quoc-Viet Dang wrote:I like the ad on the side "make 'er scream with parts you can trust", lol, GENIUS!

Yea, way too many combinations going on.

I would also like to see 255/40 on the Kosei's and/or if 245/40 is still the best, try it w/ full tread, 6/10, 4/10. O the possibilities.

QV
- going back to taking a bunch of old parts off & throwing a bunch of new parts at his car while screaming "go faster!"
:lol: :lol: :lol:

can you have nicole make me some " I <3 TRwheels"
http://www.osgiken.net
4 BSP- 2019 Mazda ND Miata - 2001 SSM Honda S2000
OS Giken / Bride / ShaftWorks USA
Arthur Grant
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:13 pm
Club: TCC
Car#: 314

Re: GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

Post by Arthur Grant »

Jeff Wong wrote:http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/5549/imagetlx.jpg
http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/3622/image0001s.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Time to get some SSR's! :lol: :roll:

"Finally, we wanted to evaluate our changes every step of the way. A lot of people tend to follow prevailing wisdom or assumption to throw a bunch of parts at a car. We want to know just how much each components or changes helps-or hurts-our march toward success. With the help of our partners at Tire Rack and their test track we will do our best to measure the effects of every tweak." - John Rogers GRM October 2010

I'm amazed that the 'hot setup' was not examined further. I'd be interested to see how the results would have ended up with the TRMotorsports C3 + 245/40/17 Dunlops. Also I wonder if the 3mm in offset difference would have made a difference.

Kosei K1 TS 17x9: 45mm Offset
TRMotorsports C3 17x9: 48mm Offset

/Discuss
I am scratching my head on how an October 2010 article gets published in August. Somebody is sneaking a look at issues in work.
User avatar
Jeff Wong
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 146

Re: GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

Post by Jeff Wong »

Arthur Grant wrote:I am scratching my head on how an October 2010 article gets published in August. Somebody is sneaking a look at issues in work.
Huh.... :?: Interesting....
Jeff Wong
1994 Honda Civic- STS
ProParts USA
Like Us on Facebook
User avatar
John Stimson
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 124

Re: GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

Post by John Stimson »

My intuition says that it's the tire size, not the weight, that gives most of the benefit. We've all seen straight-up wheel weight comparisons before, right? Not a lot of difference in those. Not 0.7 seconds.
User avatar
Jeff Wong
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 146

Re: GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

Post by Jeff Wong »

John Stimson wrote:My intuition says that it's the tire size, not the weight, that gives most of the benefit. We've all seen straight-up wheel weight comparisons before, right? Not a lot of difference in those. Not 0.7 seconds.
:thumbup: I'm on board with ya!
Jeff Wong
1994 Honda Civic- STS
ProParts USA
Like Us on Facebook
User avatar
John Stimson
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 124

Re: GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

Post by John Stimson »

Magazine dates are funny. They're used to indicate how long they should be kept on store shelves, so they show up well in advance of the date on the cover. On another forum, someone said that the GRM October issue (or September/October issue? -- 10 issues/year) is mailing out now.
User avatar
Kurt Rahn
Posts: 3923
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 88
Location: Pasadena

Re: GRM/TireRack Wheel/Tire Evaluation (STR MX-5)

Post by Kurt Rahn »

John Stimson wrote:Magazine dates are funny. They're used to indicate how long they should be kept on store shelves, so they show up well in advance of the date on the cover. On another forum, someone said that the GRM October issue (or September/October issue? -- 10 issues/year) is mailing out now.
Yup. Got mine a few days ago.
==============
Oversteer is better than understeer because you don't see the tree you're hitting.
Post Reply