FasTrack Posted

General discussions about Solo

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

Post Reply
Bob Beamesderfer
Posts: 3376
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: PSCC
Location: Orange
Contact:

FasTrack Posted

Post by Bob Beamesderfer »

http://www.scca.com/documents/Fastrack/ ... ck-dec.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Aaron Goldsmith
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 4:22 pm
Club: CASOC
Car#: 32
Location: HB, CA

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Aaron Goldsmith »

“Wings must stay in a fixed position while the vehicle is on course. Wings designed to be adjustable while the car is in
motion must be locked in a single position”
hahaha

"Per the STAC, for the 2002-2007 Subaru WRX, the heat shield attached to both the turbo and downpipe is an
exhaust heat shield and is therefore subject to “minimal modification” allowed in 14.10.D"
Last edited by Aaron Goldsmith on Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bob Beamesderfer
Posts: 3376
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: PSCC
Location: Orange
Contact:

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Bob Beamesderfer »

Aaron Goldsmith wrote:“Wings must stay in a fixed position while the vehicle is on course. Wings designed to be adjustable while the car is in
motion must be locked in a single position”
hahaha
Sorry, Vic. :lol:
User avatar
Mako Koiwai
Posts: 6490
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 34
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Contact:

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Mako Koiwai »

for the 2002-2007 Subaru WRX, the heat shield attached to both the turbo and downpipe is an
exhaust heat shield and is therefore subject to “minimal modification”
Why do people bother with things like this?

That heat shield is a piece of junk, and very difficult to make work with the various STX/STU downpipes. Why make more work trying to make it fit with those aftermarket downpipes? And who's to determine what is "minimal modification?" Typically one must cut some of the heat shield out to make room, if one hopes to use some of the oem attachment points. Is this just non-AWD sour grapes?
User avatar
Max Hayter
Posts: 2044
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 31
Location: Powdering the boys...

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Max Hayter »

Mako Koiwai wrote:
Why do people bother with things like this?

That heat shield is a piece of junk, and very difficult to make work with the various STX/STU downpipes. Why make more work trying to make it fit with those aftermarket downpipes? And who's to determine what is "minimal modification?" Typically one must cut some of the heat shield out to make room, if one hopes to use some of the oem attachment points. Is this just non-AWD sour grapes?
The previous fastrack implied that it could not be modified at all, therefore making every single aftermarket downpipe on a Subaru illegal for STX/STU Subarus.

We all complained, and they very wisely issued this clarification. I applaud the STAC to listening to us in this instance.

Not that I care anymore :?
~Max H.

Gearhead's Garage/FRSport

#31 SSC
User avatar
Sebastian Rios
King of Fastrack!
Posts: 1656
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 397
Location: Out to lunch

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Sebastian Rios »

Max Hayter wrote: The previous fastrack implied that it could not be modified at all, therefore making every single aftermarket downpipe on a Subaru illegal for STX/STU Subarus.

We all complained, and they very wisely issued this clarification. I applaud the STAC to listening to us in this instance.

Not that I care anymore :?
I agree, this was an easy one for Patch and friends to get right. :thumbup:
User avatar
Mike Simanyi
Former Club Chair
Posts: 2460
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: No$
Car#: 6

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Mike Simanyi »

Thanks to several of our own - you know who you are - for providing the documentation needed to reclarify...

Mike
User avatar
Max Hayter
Posts: 2044
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 31
Location: Powdering the boys...

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Max Hayter »

Mike Simanyi wrote:Thanks to several of our own - you know who you are - for providing the documentation needed to reclarify...

Mike
:heyes:
~Max H.

Gearhead's Garage/FRSport

#31 SSC
Greg Peng
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 908
Location: Redondo Beach, CA

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Greg Peng »

What is considered the "minimum ammount necessary to accomodate allowed alternate exhaust components"? If there is a heatshield wrapped around the OEM downpipe, possibly attached by various weld points, does this heatshield need to be re-mounted onto an aftermarket downpipe?
User avatar
Mike Simanyi
Former Club Chair
Posts: 2460
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: No$
Car#: 6

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Mike Simanyi »

Greg Peng wrote:What is considered the "minimum amount necessary to accommodate allowed alternate exhaust components"?
What's that great Supreme Court quote on the definition of "pornography"?

"Max"? Nah... that wasn't it.

Oh yeah... something like "I know it when I see it."

Greg, remove the least material you need to give your exhaust, wrapped or otherwise, room to clear. It's like the brake backing plate allowance for aftermarket brakes: remove the minimum you need to make it work. If you get greedy to reduce the weight more, don't be surprised if you're protested.

All that's in my humble and minimum unofficial opinion though. :mrgreen:

Mike
User avatar
Chuck Fowler
Posts: 471
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: Team Blew
Car#: 299

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Chuck Fowler »

"STREET TOURING
- The STAC has recommended the following proposal, which is being published here for member review and feedback: Add a new
subsection 14.2.H as follows (ref. 08-535):
H. Longitudinal (fore-aft) subframe connectors (“SFCs”) are permitted with the following restrictions:
1. They must only connect previously unconnected boxed frame rails on unibody vehicles.
2. Each SFC must attach at no more than three points on the unibody (e.g. front, rear, and one point in between such
as a seat mount brace or rocker box brace).
3. SFCs must be bolted in place and not welded.
4. No cutting of OE subframes or floorpan stampings is permitted. Drilling is permitted for mounting bolts only.
5. No cross-car/lateral/triangulated connections directly between the driver’s side and passenger’s side SFCs are permitted.
Connections to OE components such as tunnel braces or closure panels via bolts are allowed and count as
the third point of attachment. No alteration to the OE components is permitted.
6. SFCs may not be used to attach other components (including but not limited to torque arm front mounts or driveshaft
loops) and may serve no other purpose."

did someone complain about thier car starting to twist?
it's only paranoia if your wrong
User avatar
Eric Clements
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 895
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: No$
Car#: 30
Location: Pasadena

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Eric Clements »

Chuck Fowler wrote:"did someone complain about thier car starting to twist?
No, ST just wishes they were SP :P
User avatar
Richard Jung
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 71
Location: Irvine, CA
Contact:

Re: FasTrack Posted

Post by Richard Jung »

Eric Clements wrote:
Chuck Fowler wrote:"did someone complain about thier car starting to twist?
No, ST just wishes they were SP :P
Sounds like a Mustang thang.
Post Reply