Stock class brake question

General discussions about Solo

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

Post Reply
Steve Eguina
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am

Stock class brake question

Post by Steve Eguina »

Hi Gang!

I Don't have a rule book handy and have to replace the pads and rotors on my 03 Z06.

Can I use drilled or slotted rotors in the stock class?

Thanks Steve
User avatar
Jason Isley BS RX8
Posts: 1129
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Car#: 0
Location: Coto de Caza
Contact:

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by Jason Isley BS RX8 »

Steve Eguina wrote:Hi Gang!

I Don't have a rule book handy and have to replace the pads and rotors on my 03 Z06.

Can I use drilled or slotted rotors in the stock class?

Thanks Steve
No.
User avatar
Mako Koiwai
Posts: 6490
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 34
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Contact:

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by Mako Koiwai »

Cryo'ed ones?
User avatar
Steve Ekstrand
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 7482
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 15
Location: This space left intentionally blank
Contact:

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by Steve Ekstrand »

In my book, you have to allow cryo treated parts. You can't detect in any reliable or realistic way.

If Cryo is illegal, then what about a seasoned block? What about rotors blessed by a shaman high priest?
What if Michael Palero farts into his gas tank?

These are just not areas I want to worry about policing.....


I consider the whole area of cryo a "gays in the military" situation.
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by Craig Naylor »

Mako Koiwai wrote:Cryo'ed ones?
Since I assume freezing them prior to installing them, would still be at temp by the time you run. I would also assume deep freezing them would make them brittle. So for those like myself not enlightened, please share.
User avatar
Steve Ekstrand
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 7482
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 15
Location: This space left intentionally blank
Contact:

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by Steve Ekstrand »

http://www.nwcryo.com/FAQs.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
Steve Eguina
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by Steve Eguina »

Thanks for the help
User avatar
Thomas Smith
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 158
Location: Lakewood

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by Thomas Smith »

Steve Ekstrand wrote:In my book, you have to allow cryo treated parts. You can't detect in any reliable or realistic way.
I think Cryo treating can be considered a manufacturing process and therefore allowed since there are no rules stating how brake rotors have to be made.

What about heat setting coil suspension springs? You can easily shorten the free length of a coil spring to lower a car. As long as you meet the factory specs on free length and ride height its undetectable.
Thomas Smith
User avatar
Kurt Rahn
Posts: 3923
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:29 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 88
Location: Pasadena

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by Kurt Rahn »

I saw a whole thread on the NASIOC site (I think) talking about cryo treating transmission parts (which are apparently the weak link) on certain years' WRXs. Anyway, a lot of people seemed pretty vehement in arguing that cryo treating was against the rules. But I think I'm with Steve...if you can't tell a part's been cryo treated without breaking out an electron microscope or sending shavings to a lab, then how do you enforce it?
==============
Oversteer is better than understeer because you don't see the tree you're hitting.
Aaron Goldsmith
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 4:22 pm
Club: CASOC
Car#: 32
Location: HB, CA

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by Aaron Goldsmith »

Kurt Rahn wrote:I saw a whole thread on the NASIOC site (I think) talking about cryo treating transmission parts (which are apparently the weak link) on certain years' WRXs. Anyway, a lot of people seemed pretty vehement in arguing that cryo treating was against the rules. But I think I'm with Steve...if you can't tell a part's been cryo treated without breaking out an electron microscope or sending shavings to a lab, then how do you enforce it?
It's probably technically illegal for the same reason using stronger head bolts is illegal, bu tit's also pretty much unenforceable. So.. if you were to use Cryo'd parts.. I would just not talk about it on the internet :lol:
User avatar
John Prosser
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am

Re: Stock class brake question

Post by John Prosser »

Aaron Goldsmith wrote:
Kurt Rahn wrote:I saw a whole thread on the NASIOC site (I think) talking about cryo treating transmission parts (which are apparently the weak link) on certain years' WRXs. Anyway, a lot of people seemed pretty vehement in arguing that cryo treating was against the rules. But I think I'm with Steve...if you can't tell a part's been cryo treated without breaking out an electron microscope or sending shavings to a lab, then how do you enforce it?
It's probably technically illegal for the same reason using stronger head bolts is illegal, but it's also pretty much unenforceable. So.. if you were to use Cryo'd parts.. I would just not talk about it on the internet :lol:
Unenforceable bu tit's sound like Max's department to me
Post Reply