the economist gets trolled.

[Jeff Shyu]

http://www.economist.com/node/15993648/comments" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Michael Palero]

LMFAO

Code: Select all

r3loaded wrote: Apr 26th 2010 5:57 GMT
Asine and sarcastic comment pointing out the absurdity of this article goes here.


Electrichead wrote: Apr 26th 2010 5:59 GMT
Pointless follow-up comment in "default" font goes here


Km62wranF8 wrote: Apr 26th 2010 6:02 GMT
Headline goes where?


brujohnson wrote: Apr 26th 2010 6:22 GMT
Shouldn't the Fly-title be in "fly-title" font?


NirajC wrote: Apr 26th 2010 6:32 GMT
Comment goes here in "comment" font.


The Bird wrote: Apr 26th 2010 6:47 GMT
Comment blasting the blantant pro/anti-Israeli and-or pro/anti-Palestinian bias of the article goes here.


unbeliever wrote: Apr 26th 2010 7:07 GMT
300 word diatribe attacking The Bird for his pro/anti-Israel bias that reflects more on my lack of character than any facts goes here.


oikos-nomos wrote: Apr 26th 2010 7:15 GMT
I have always wondered what a fly-title was.


Justin Beach wrote: Apr 26th 2010 7:16 GMT
Comment blaming the entire thing on socialist left wing policies and accusing you of being biased toward them.


scilgailtn wrote: Apr 26th 2010 7:31 GMT
Comment blaming George Bush and/or all Christians for the issues brought up in this article and a few issues unrelated to this article.

[George Schilling]

I think anything as politically charged as this belongs in PP. This was clearly written to incite political passions without regard for the facts or the truth. Come on Jeff, you should know better.