Fighting the Last War

Read at your own risk.

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

Post Reply
User avatar
John Coffey
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 250
Location: La Habra, CA
Contact:

Fighting the Last War

Post by John Coffey »

True in military circles and true in risk management:

http://www.economist.com/finance%20/dis ... d=11897037" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Fighting the last war

The focus of our risk management was on the loan portfolio and classic market risk. Loans were illiquid and accounted for on an accrual basis in the “banking book” rather than on a mark-to-market basis in the “trading book”. Rigorous credit analysis to ensure minimum loan-loss provisions was important. Loan risks and classic market risks were generally well understood and regularly reviewed. Equities, government bonds and foreign exchange, and their derivatives, were well managed in the trading book and monitored on a daily basis.

The gap in our risk management only opened up gradually over the years with the growth of traded credit products such as CDO tranches and other asset-backed securities. These sat uncomfortably between market and credit risk. The market-risk department never really took ownership of them, believing them to be primarily credit-risk instruments, and the credit-risk department thought of them as market risk as they sat in the trading book.

The explosive growth and profitability of the structured-credit market made this an ever greater problem. Our risk-management response was half-hearted. We set portfolio limits on each rating category but otherwise left the trading desks to their own devices. We made two assumptions which would cost us dearly. First, we thought that all mark-to-market positions in the trading book would receive immediate attention when losses occurred, because their profits and losses were published daily. Second, we assumed that, if the market ran into difficulties, we could easily adjust and liquidate our positions, especially on securities rated AAA and AA. Our focus was always on the non-investment-grade part of the portfolio, especially the emerging-markets paper. The previous crises in Russia and Latin America had left a deeply ingrained fear of sudden liquidity shocks and widening credit spreads. Ironically, of course, in the credit crunch the emerging-market bonds have outperformed the Western credit assets.

We also trusted the rating agencies. It is hard to imagine now but the reputation of outside bond ratings was so high that if the risk department had ever assigned a lower rating, our judgment would have been immediately questioned. It was assumed that the rating agencies simply knew best.
User avatar
Steve Ekstrand
Solo Safety Steward
Posts: 7482
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: CASOC
Car#: 15
Location: This space left intentionally blank
Contact:

Re: Fighting the Last War

Post by Steve Ekstrand »

Good find John, I printed to PDF and saved the link. I might point my students to it.

I'm still not sure where we go from here with the bond/credit rating services. I think we're going to see more and more indepth investigations of what went on in that industry and I bet we find some smoking guns. And how do we trust any rating/grade coming forward???
Dr. Conemangler
aka The Malefic One
2015 Wildcat Honda F600
User avatar
John Coffey
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:24 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 250
Location: La Habra, CA
Contact:

Re: Fighting the Last War

Post by John Coffey »

And how do we trust any rating/grade coming forward???
I think we have to rely on our own judgment. Rating agencies of all kinds (bonds, movies, College Football rankings) are all subject to ignorance, bias, and corruption. They are a shortcut to proper due diligence.
Bob Beamesderfer
Posts: 3376
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: PSCC
Location: Orange
Contact:

Re: Fighting the Last War

Post by Bob Beamesderfer »

John Coffey wrote:
And how do we trust any rating/grade coming forward???
I think we have to rely on our own judgment. Rating agencies of all kinds (bonds, movies, College Football rankings) are all subject to ignorance, bias, and corruption. They are a shortcut to proper due diligence.
I don't think rating movies and rating bonds should be lumped together, but your point is a good one. The perhaps surprising thing is that it wasn't small investors who didn't investigate the validity of the ratings, it was supposed professionals handling large sums of money.

"Moody's says this stuff is AAA. Good enough for me; let's knock off early and head to the links."
Post Reply