FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

General discussions about Solo

Moderator: Mike Simanyi

User avatar
Jason Isley BS RX8
Posts: 1129
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Car#: 0
Location: Coto de Caza
Contact:

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Jason Isley BS RX8 »

Michael Palero wrote:
Jeff Wong wrote: Not good for Seb :lol: He has a good eye for those downed/displaced cones!
:lol: +1 He does! he must have bought an autocross alignment for his eyes from Dr. Jason Flores
Drive as slow as him and you might be amazed at what you can see. }:)
User avatar
John Stimson
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 124

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by John Stimson »

The changes to 7.4 and 7.9 (re-runs) don't really seem to change much about how CSCC (or just about any other club) does things. Mostly they just seem to emphasize the need to not be too slow when you slowly complete the course.
User avatar
Kristoffer Gjevre
Posts: 447
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Location: SoCal

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Kristoffer Gjevre »

Change 7.9.2 to read as follows:
“7.9.2 Displaced or Downed Pylons on Course
A competitor encountering a downed or displaced pylon on course has the option of continuing the run or stopping
as soon as possible, and pointing out the downed or displaced pylon to a course worker. If the competitor stops,
he or she must proceed off course and will then be granted a rerun
. However, if the competitor completes the run,
the time will stand.”

In conjunction with the above, change 7.4 to read as follows:
“7.4 RERUNS
Reruns will be granted only for timing failure, object on the course, or red flag, and will not be given because
of mechanical or other failure of the competitor’s car. A minimum of five minutes must have elapsed before a
competitor may take a rerun.
Pylon penalties are not carried over to the rerun. A DNF on a run for which a rerun would have been given shall
stand and no reruns shall be given.
In the case in which a competitor is red flagged or stops for a downed or displaced cone on the course, the
competitor may continue slowly through the remainder of the course, or may exit the course directly, and will
be granted a rerun if appropriate.
Failure to exit the remainder of the course at an appropriately reduced speed
(generally 70-80% of competition speed) will result in a DNF for that run. It is important to clear the course in a
timely manner in order to avoid impeding the progress of the car following, and to ensure the event remains on
schedule.”
This seems to be inconsistent.
7.9.2 says "must proceed off course" if you stop for a "downed or displaced pylon",
but 7.4 says "may continue slowly through the remainder of the course, or may exit the course directly" if red flagged or stops for a "downed or displaced cone".

or maybe the key here is that there is one rule for a downed or displaced pylon and another for a cone? }:)
User avatar
Kristoffer Gjevre
Posts: 447
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Location: SoCal

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Kristoffer Gjevre »

BTW, not much better in the 2010 rules:
7.9.2 Pylons Down on Course
A competitor encountering a downed or displaced pylon on course has
the option of continuing the run or stopping as soon as possible, and
pointing out the downed or displaced pylon to a course worker. If the
competitor stops, he or she must proceed directly and slowly off course
and will then be granted a rerun.
However, if the competitor completes
the run, the time will stand. In the case in which a competitor is red
flagged or stops for a downed or displaced cone on the course, the
competitor may continue slowly through the remainder of the course,
or may exit the course directly, and will be granted a rerun if appropriate.

Failure to exit the remainder of the course at an appropriate speed
(generally 25-30 mph) will result in a DNF for that run. It is important
to clear the course in a timely manner to ensure the event remains on
schedule.
Reruns for downed cones after the timing fi nish line will only be given at
the discretion of the Chief Steward.
Last edited by Kristoffer Gjevre on Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Arthur Grant
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:13 pm
Club: TCC
Car#: 314

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Arthur Grant »

evidently drafted by different subcommittees.
User avatar
Mike Simanyi
Former Club Chair
Posts: 2460
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:26 am
Club: No$
Car#: 6

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Mike Simanyi »

The intent is to drive on the defined course at a reduced speed. I can understand the interpretations though. Stay tuned...

Mike
User avatar
John Stimson
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: PSCC
Car#: 124

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by John Stimson »

Giovanni Jaramillo wrote:The things that jumped out where things like BMW M3 (E46, E36) moving from BSP to CSP (along with the Mazda RX-8).
Yeah, that was one of the proposals listed as "tabled".
User avatar
Craig Naylor
Posts: 1973
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:30 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 80
Location: Long Beach

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Craig Naylor »

Under ST rules
C. Tires must have a minimum UTQG tread wear rating of 140 and a minimum molded tread depth of greater than
7/32”, as manufactured.
With the existing 140 wear rating rule, and an exclusion list possible... whats the point of adding a minimum tread depth as manufactured, when shaving is not disallowed?
User avatar
Sebastian Rios
King of Fastrack!
Posts: 1656
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:27 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 397
Location: Out to lunch

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Sebastian Rios »

Jeff and Jason can bite me. :lol:
The conflicting verbiage is weird for sure.

And this nice fat fasttrack is great for off season bench racing and all, but when are we going to see the magical mystery ST re-org?
User avatar
Jason Flores
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 886
Location: Riverside CA
Contact:

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Jason Flores »

Michael Palero wrote:
Jeff Wong wrote: Not good for Seb :lol: He has a good eye for those downed/displaced cones!
:lol: +1 He does! he must have bought an autocross alignment for his eyes from Dr. Jason Flores
Palero also has good eyes for boxes with no cones in them too bad most dident have any cones to start with!!! =)
User avatar
Mako Koiwai
Posts: 6490
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: SCNAX
Car#: 34
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Contact:

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Mako Koiwai »

I remember that incident! He was soooo sure ... :lol:
Aaron Goldsmith
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 4:22 pm
Club: CASOC
Car#: 32
Location: HB, CA

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Aaron Goldsmith »

Rick Brown wrote:
Jeff Wong wrote:“7.9.2 Displaced or Downed Pylons on Course
A competitor encountering a downed or displaced pylon on course has the option of continuing the run or stopping
as soon as possible, and pointing out the downed or displaced pylon to a course worker. If the competitor stops,
he or she must proceed off course and will then be granted a rerun. However, if the competitor completes the run,
the time will stand.”

Not good for Seb :lol: He has a good eye for those downed/displaced cones!
Is this a section we have to follow? Basically means you have to red flag all cars on course as a slow moving car along the outside of the course would almost always be considered a safety hazard. People can often point out down/out cones without impacting following cars.

It's if the competitor completes the run without stopping. The wording is confusing, the "However" is saying what happens if the previous sentence isn't followed.
Arthur Grant
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:13 pm
Club: TCC
Car#: 314

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Arthur Grant »

Aaron Goldsmith wrote:"Move from ASP to BSP:
MR2 turbo & N/A (’91-’95)
Note: remove N/A from CSP"

Mr. Clements to the NA with a 3sgte courtesy phone.
What is N/A?
Giovanni Jaramillo
Posts: 2761
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:25 am
Club: PSCC

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Giovanni Jaramillo »

Arthur Grant wrote:What is N/A?
Normally Aspirated
Arthur Grant
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:13 pm
Club: TCC
Car#: 314

Re: FasTrack News (Solo) - November 2010

Post by Arthur Grant »

Giovanni Jaramillo wrote:
Arthur Grant wrote:What is N/A?
Normally Aspirated

Thanks
Post Reply